uired.
(can't forget that this is a world-wide newsgroup...)
Best Regards,
Patrick.
p.con...@hp.com
From: Pettit, Ghery [mailto:ghery.pet...@intel.com]
Sent: Monday, July 24, 2006 11:34 PM
To: Conway, Patrick R (Houston); John Woodgate; emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: RE: A2LA vs NVLAP
Th
: Sunday, July 23, 2006 5:00 PM
To: John Woodgate; emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: RE: A2LA vs NVLAP
Grace's English is very good, but not necessarily up to
deciphering typos.
Actually- **my** English is not good enough to decipher those two
possibilities.
But, I was schooled i
Grace's English is very good, but not necessarily up to
deciphering typos.
Actually- **my** English is not good enough to decipher those two
possibilities.
But, I was schooled in one of the southern U.S. states, so maybe
my education is to blame
To expand on the question
In message
<51b0e17d0920404a967d381039139ad0ede...@ds10965.spraycool.com>, dated
Wed, 19 Jul 2006, McInturff Gary writes
>They did a fine job and we had to problems with customers
You mean 'no problems', not 'two problems'? Remember, Grace's English is
very good, but not necessarily up to deci
When the NIST program first became available I used NVLAP for emissions –
radiated and conducted, ESD, and EFT – which were all of the in-house tests
we chose to have at the time. They did a fine job and we had to problems with
customers or agencies with NVLAP as our accrediting body for the next t
5 matches
Mail list logo
