RE: EN60529-ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA Clause 14.3

2010-10-18 Thread emc-p...@ieee.org
Hello Constantin, CTL Decision Sheets: http://www.iecee.org/ctl/decisions.htm I do not know off hand if this is addressed in CTL or OSM decisions. The answer to your question specific to 60950 equipment might be contained in 60950-22 Information technology equipment - Safety - Part 22:

Re: EN60529

2002-01-17 Thread John Woodgate
I read in !emc-pstc that John Woodgate j...@jmwa.demon.co.uk wrote (in R6gx4$aiyin8e...@jmwa.demon.co.uk) about 'EN60529', on Thu, 3 Jan 2002: I read in !emc-pstc that Crabb, John jo...@exchange.scotland.ncr.com wrote (in B6CD5947CF30D411A1350050DA4B75FF03C23387@sgbdun200.scotland.n cr.com) about

Re: EN60529

2002-01-03 Thread John Woodgate
I read in !emc-pstc that Crabb, John jo...@exchange.scotland.ncr.com wrote (in B6CD5947CF30D411A1350050DA4B75FF03C23387@sgbdun200.scotland.n cr.com) about 'EN60529', on Thu, 3 Jan 2002: John, I have forwarded this information to the chairman of BSI committee EPL/74 (which deals with EN60950),

RE: EN60529

2002-01-03 Thread Crabb, John
...@majordomo.ieee.org Subject: Re: EN60529 I read in !emc-pstc that richwo...@tycoint.com wrote (in 846BF526A205F8 4BA2B6045BBF7E9A6ABC4FD0@flbocexu05) about 'EN60529', on Wed, 2 Jan 2002: It is referenced in the OJ under the LVD, yet a reading of the standard indicates that it is a basic standard intended

Re: EN60529

2002-01-02 Thread John Woodgate
I read in !emc-pstc that richwo...@tycoint.com wrote (in 846BF526A205F8 4BA2B6045BBF7E9A6ABC4FD0@flbocexu05) about 'EN60529', on Wed, 2 Jan 2002: It is referenced in the OJ under the LVD, yet a reading of the standard indicates that it is a basic standard intended to be referenced in product