RE: IEC 61000-4-4 ed.2, verification of CDNs

2007-06-14 Thread emc-p...@ieee.org
lf Of T.Sato Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2007 7:50 AM To: emc-p...@ieee.org Subject: RE: IEC 61000-4-4 ed.2, verification of CDNs On Tue, 6 Feb 2007 11:25:38 -0500, "Hopkins, Michael J." wrote: > There is currently a corrigendum circulating to clarify this issue, > but the way it&#x

RE: IEC 61000-4-4 ed.2, verification of CDNs

2007-06-14 Thread emc-p...@ieee.org
On Tue, 6 Feb 2007 11:25:38 -0500, "Hopkins, Michael J." wrote: > There is currently a corrigendum circulating to clarify this issue, but > the way it's currently written, it probably won't survive. I found that the issue is now clarified in IEC 61000-4-4 Corr.2 ed. 2.0 (2007-06), as it no

RE: IEC 61000-4-4 ed.2, verification of CDNs

2007-02-07 Thread emc-p...@ieee.org
On Tue, 6 Feb 2007 11:25:38 -0500, "Hopkins, Michael J." wrote: > There is currently a corrigendum circulating to clarify this issue, but > the way it's currently written, it probably won't survive. ... > In either case, most also agree that the calibration should be done for > each line ou

RE: IEC 61000-4-4 ed.2, verification of CDNs

2007-02-06 Thread emc-p...@ieee.org
>From another manufacturer: There is currently a corrigendum circulating to clarify this issue, but the way it's currently written, it probably won't survive. Most agree the calibration should be done at the output terminals where the EFT is to be applied: direct output or through a CDN.