RE: Low signal switching

2003-04-23 Thread djumbdenst...@tycoint.com
of attenuation and insure sufficient current cleaning of my contacts. Thanks for the insight. Best regards, Don From: robert Macy [mailto:m...@california.com] Sent: Monday, April 21, 2003 2:46 PM To: djumbdenst...@tycoint.com; emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org Subject: Re: Low signal switching

Re: Low signal switching

2003-04-22 Thread John Woodgate
I read in !emc-pstc that djumbdenst...@tycoint.com wrote (in <846BF526A2 05F84BA2B6045BBF7E9A6A0532B3DB@flbocexu05>) about 'Low signal switching' on Tue, 22 Apr 2003: >It had not occurred to me that electronic switches might do the job. I >don't know if isolation will be an issue, but contact res

RE: Low signal switching

2003-04-22 Thread drcuthbert
cycles to clean the gold contacts. Dave Cuthbert From: Ken Javor [mailto:ken.ja...@emccompliance.com] Sent: Monday, April 21, 2003 5:20 PM To: drcuthbert; 'djumbdenst...@tycoint.com'; emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org Subject: Re: Low signal switching I can certainly suggest a solutio

RE: Low signal switching

2003-04-22 Thread djumbdenst...@tycoint.com
en.ja...@emccompliance.com] Sent: Monday, April 21, 2003 7:20 PM To: drcuthbert; 'djumbdenst...@tycoint.com'; emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org Subject: Re: Low signal switching I can certainly suggest a solution, although it would take a bit of research to totally determine the answer. There

RE: Low signal switching

2003-04-22 Thread Price, Ed
>-Original Message- >From: djumbdenst...@tycoint.com [mailto:djumbdenst...@tycoint.com] >Sent: Monday, April 21, 2003 10:28 AM >To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org >Subject: Low signal switching > > > >Hello Friends, > >I have an application in which I would like to switch system >signals on

Re: Low signal switching

2003-04-22 Thread robert Macy
Don, It is my understanding that physical switch contacts are "cleaned" with current - and use. It is probably ok at the lower signal levels since from time to time you're running the higher levels through the switches. Is there someway you can switch and then verify contact?

Re: Low signal switching

2003-04-21 Thread Cortland Richmond
I had occasion once to look at the input relay on an NM-37. The set acted as if relay contacts were corroded -- but the sealed reed relay was fine; the problem was a cold-solder joint. Relays sealed in inert gas or vacuum should never fail due to corrosion, and there's no need to limit their smal

Re: Low signal switching

2003-04-21 Thread Ken Javor
Mini-Circuits: http://www.minicircuits.com/ and the only amplitude related specs there were insertion loss and vswr. > From: drcuthbert > Reply-To: drcuthbert > Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2003 14:58:57 -0600 > To: "'djumbdenst...@tycoint.com'" , > emc-p...@majordomo

RE: Low signal switching

2003-04-21 Thread drcuthbert
Don, I have encountered this problem with low-level signals. It seems to vary greatly from manufacturer to manufacturer (the company we had the best results with went out of business). When the contact(s) became dirty I would run a DC current and clean it. The problem would quickly return and the

Re: Low signal switching

2003-04-21 Thread Ken Javor
There was a thread on this some time ago and I think the consensus was that the -20 dBm limit must be a typo, or a misunderstanding by the sales dept that writes the catalog copy. if the switch is purely mechanical, the signal level shouldn't matter, except for here are some wool-gathering though