I read in !emc-pstc that Pat Lawler pat.law...@verizon.net wrote (in
20040429172618.kxjh10678.out004.verizon@outgoing.verizon.net)
about 'Medical devices and voltage dip testing' on Thu, 29 Apr 2004:
EN60601-1-2:2001 (EMC requirements for general medical devices) requires
various
voltage dip
Brent DeWitt wrote:
that in the CDV (not law yet) of 1st amendment to 60601-1-2 we have
changed
essential performance from a defined term to an undefined term due to the
instability of IEC 60601-1 , which is still at the CDV stage.
My _personal_ opinion as a representative (and only that), is
To: ieee pstc list
Subject: Re: Medical devices and voltage dip testing
Pat Lawler posted:
If a product is rated for 100-240Vac operation, this means test levels
like 40Vac for 100ms (100Vac/50Hz nominal input, 60% dip for 5
cycles). The
performance criteria makes this especially difficult
Pat Lawler posted:
If a product is rated for 100-240Vac operation, this means test levels
like 40Vac for 100ms (100Vac/50Hz nominal input, 60% dip for 5 cycles). The
performance criteria makes this especially difficult - The system shall
provide essential performance.
Do not forget that, in
Hi Pat:
If a product is rated for 100-240Vac operation, this
means test levels like 40Vac for 100ms (100Vac/50Hz
nominal input, 60% dip for 5 cycles). The performance
criteria makes this especially difficult - The system
shall provide essential performance.
This
5 matches
Mail list logo