Re: Medical devices and voltage dip testing

2004-05-01 Thread owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
I read in !emc-pstc that Pat Lawler pat.law...@verizon.net wrote (in 20040429172618.kxjh10678.out004.verizon@outgoing.verizon.net) about 'Medical devices and voltage dip testing' on Thu, 29 Apr 2004: EN60601-1-2:2001 (EMC requirements for general medical devices) requires various voltage dip

RE: Medical devices and voltage dip testing

2004-04-30 Thread owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Brent DeWitt wrote: that in the CDV (not law yet) of 1st amendment to 60601-1-2 we have changed essential performance from a defined term to an undefined term due to the instability of IEC 60601-1 , which is still at the CDV stage. My _personal_ opinion as a representative (and only that), is

RE: Medical devices and voltage dip testing

2004-04-30 Thread owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
To: ieee pstc list Subject: Re: Medical devices and voltage dip testing Pat Lawler posted: If a product is rated for 100-240Vac operation, this means test levels like 40Vac for 100ms (100Vac/50Hz nominal input, 60% dip for 5 cycles). The performance criteria makes this especially difficult

Re: Medical devices and voltage dip testing

2004-04-29 Thread owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Pat Lawler posted: If a product is rated for 100-240Vac operation, this means test levels like 40Vac for 100ms (100Vac/50Hz nominal input, 60% dip for 5 cycles). The performance criteria makes this especially difficult - The system shall provide essential performance. Do not forget that, in

Re: Medical devices and voltage dip testing

2004-04-29 Thread owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Hi Pat: If a product is rated for 100-240Vac operation, this means test levels like 40Vac for 100ms (100Vac/50Hz nominal input, 60% dip for 5 cycles). The performance criteria makes this especially difficult - The system shall provide essential performance. This