Vic Gibling wrote
Was the man matching the assistants humour/sarcasms?
OR
Was he ignoring the warnings, it's not going to happen to him?
OR
Was he making a rational risk assessment based on the
information provided by the manufacturer?
I'm in California. I sometimes hear an anti-smoking
I read in !emc-pstc that Gibling, Vic vic.gibl...@e2vtechnologies.com
wrote (in 4f826f960057d4118ec3009027e245380946d...@whl17.eev.uk) about
'More profound than a joke' on Mon, 22 Sep 2003:
In the UK cigarette packaging includes a large information message
indicating the health risks associated
Were it not for the risks associated with passive smoking, I would say the
customer made a wise choice if he intents to consume the product himself. He
has chosen a brand who's associated risk (as stated on the product) cannot
affect *him* personally. :o)
IANASP (I am not a safety
3 matches
Mail list logo
