RE: isolation of battery (72V max) input

1998-10-23 Thread Peter Merguerian
gards, Date sent: Thu, 22 Oct 1998 14:47:40 -0400 From: Edward Eszlari Subject: RE: isolation of battery (72V max) input To: "INTERNET:mvald...@netvision.net.il" , t...@world.std.com, emc-p...@ieee.or

RE: isolation of battery (72V max) input

1998-10-22 Thread Edward Eszlari
Moshe, The answer to your question is Reinforced insulation for the working voltage measured in that location. The 72V supply is considered hazardous voltage and if an SELV circuit is present on conductors nearby, this is the type of insulation system that is required. If this "CO like" envirome

(Fwd) Re: isolation of battery (72V max) input from SELV Circu

1998-10-21 Thread Peter Merguerian
--- Forwarded Message Follows --- From: Self To: emc-p...@ieee.org, t...@world.std.com, mvald...@netvision.net.il Subject:Re: isolation of battery (72V max) input from SELV Circuits Date sent: Wed, 21 Oct 1998 23:11:48

Re: isolation of battery (72V max) input from SELV Circuits

1998-10-21 Thread Peter Merguerian
Dear Moshe, I assume you mean creepages and clearances between input circuits and SELV circuits (and not conductors). I am also assuming you are familiar with the clearance and creepage Tables in UL1950 and/or EN 60950 which depends on the Installation Category and Pollution Degree. In regar

RE: isolation of battery (72V max) input

1998-10-21 Thread Kretsch, John
Moshe: We treat the 48V input as a secondary voltage with primary voltage rules. Therefore, you will have to hold to the _reinforced_ distances for creepage and clearance. Regards, John R. Kretsch, P.E. Compliance Engineering Supervisor ADC Broadband Communications john_kret...@adc.com -O