On Fri, 14 Nov 2003 10:38:01 +0100 (CET),
r...@rpgarner.freeserve.co.uk wrote:
Be warned, something like this was tried by a UK manufacturer.
They failed the tests, then persauded a Competent body to sign off
a TCF stating that the failed tests were not applicable or were
unpassable by
passed.
And their equipment did pass after redesign.
Regards
Ray Garner
EMC Consultant WRSL
Message date : Nov 13 2003, 05:47 PM
From : rehel...@mmm.com
To : T.Sato
Copy to : emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject : Re: Immunity testing mitigations
On 12 Nov 2003, Tom wrote
If you are so
On 12 Nov 2003, Tom wrote
If you are so sure that your product complies with the protection
requirements of the EMC Directive even if it failed to pass the test,
you have chance to use TCF Route instead of the Standard Route.
Regards,
Tom
Tom, could you explain your thinking on this a little
On Wed, 12 Nov 2003 07:43:28 -0500,
Bill Flanigan bflani...@ameritherm.com wrote:
I'm embarking on a CE test-cycle under EN61326 and I wonder...
If I encounter problems under EFT, Burst or Vdips/interruptions, what
mitigating steps are available?
If you are so sure that your product
4 matches
Mail list logo