RE: apertures

2003-07-21 Thread C N
Yes, the potential across the closer of the the two sides of a slot is saying the same thing as the potential across the longest sides. i.e. the closer of the two sides of a slot are the longest sides of that slot. And technically speaking, babinet's principle is concerned with optics. Taking

RE: apertures

2003-07-16 Thread Brench, Colin
One approach to take for small apertures in solid sheets is to reverse the model. That is model the equivalent dipole, you will have far fewer elements and no meshing issues. Due to the duality between E and H known as Babinet's priciple, this is vaild method. Check out slide 8 on this

RE: apertures

2003-07-16 Thread drcuthb...@micron.com
planes together. Dave From: C N [mailto:abx...@hotmail.com] Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 8:29 PM To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org Subject: RE: apertures I usually have a problem with these equations. They give no reference to the angle at which the wave is impinging upon the sheet. The way

Re: apertures

2003-07-11 Thread Pat Lawler
On Thu, 10 Jul 2003 12:58:49 -0600, drcuthb...@micron.com wrote: >I have a question on apertures. You may recall the formula that is frequently given for signal attenuation through a small aperture in a large conductive sheet. It is 20LOG(I/2L), where I is the wavelength and L is the slot len

RE: apertures

2003-07-10 Thread C N
I usually have a problem with these equations. They give no reference to the angle at which the wave is impinging upon the sheet. The way slots work is to put amaximum differential between the longest sides. If the impinging wave puts a circulating current laterally across the slot, the slot w

RE: apertures

2003-07-10 Thread Brench, Colin
e you some means of achieving this. Colin.. From: drcuthb...@micron.com [mailto:drcuthb...@micron.com] Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 7:03 PM To: ed.pr...@cubic.com; emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org Subject: RE: apertures Ed, thanks you did give me the answer I was looking f

RE: apertures

2003-07-10 Thread drcuthb...@micron.com
actually want to increase the signal that passes through an aperture. I will be interested to see what others tell us. Dave From: Price, Ed [mailto:ed.pr...@cubic.com] Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 3:08 PM To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org Subject: RE: apertures >-Original Mess

RE: apertures

2003-07-10 Thread Price, Ed
>-Original Message- >From: drcuthb...@micron.com [ mailto:drcuthb...@micron.com] >Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 11:59 AM >To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org >Subject: apertures > > > >I have a question on apertures. You may recall the formula >that

RE: apertures

2003-07-10 Thread drcuthb...@micron.com
thbert > Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 12:59 PM > To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org > Subject: apertures > > I have a question on apertures. You may recall the formula that is frequently given for signal attenuation through a small aperture in a large conductive sheet. It is 20

apertures

2003-07-10 Thread drcuthb...@micron.com
I have a question on apertures. You may recall the formula that is frequently given for signal attenuation through a small aperture in a large conductive sheet. It is 20LOG(I/2L), where I is the wavelength and L is the slot length. For example, if x is 1/2-wavelength then the attenuation is 0 dB