RE: comment in UL file

2007-03-13 Thread emc-p...@ieee.org
Brian - I reread your post and see I may have misunderstood your question. The statement you cited was in a UL report or in a Recognition Card? If in a report, it is utterly useless and is an example of poor report writing. Not quite useless if it was in a Recognition Card, since it would

RE: comment in UL file

2007-03-13 Thread emc-p...@ieee.org
From: Brian O'Connell Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2007 12:48 PM In an OBMW2 (UL) file, this comment is attached to one of the wire types: Additional consideration is needed before its use in System's thermal aging. Brian - Looks like it's a catch-all flag. It doesn't appear

comment in UL file

2007-03-13 Thread emc-p...@ieee.org
In an OBMW2 (UL) file, this comment is attached to one of the wire types: Additional consideration is needed before its use in System's thermal aging. While I am waiting for the usual 5 to 20 day reply time from an agency engineer, could someone please advise if this means anything speacil