Re: double-pole switching and fusing

I read in !emc-pstc that Rich Nute ri...@sdd.hp.com wrote (in 200202251628.iaa26...@epgc264.sdd.hp.com) about 'double-pole switching and fusing', on Mon, 25 Feb 2002: Hi John: I read in !emc-pstc that Rich Nute ri...@sdd.hp.com wrote (in 200202202227.oaa19...@epgc264.sdd.hp.com) about

Re: double-pole switching and fusing

Hi John: I read in !emc-pstc that Rich Nute ri...@sdd.hp.com wrote (in 200202202227.oaa19...@epgc264.sdd.hp.com) about 'double-pole switching and fusing', on Wed, 20 Feb 2002: Tables 2E and 2F are invoked only by the Note 2 to Sub-clause 2.7.4. A Note is informative

Re: double-pole switching and fusing

I read in !emc-pstc that Rich Nute ri...@sdd.hp.com wrote (in 200202202227.oaa19...@epgc264.sdd.hp.com) about 'double-pole switching and fusing', on Wed, 20 Feb 2002: Tables 2E and 2F are invoked only by the Note 2 to Sub-clause 2.7.4. A Note is informative, not a requirement. Yes, well, Note 2

double-pole switching and fusing

and neutral were reversed, except for the issues relating to a single pole disconnect device and fusing. See Tables 2E and 2F in IEC/EN60950:2000. Double-pole switching and fusing is almost always necessary in practice. Tables 2E and 2F are invoked only by the Note 2 to Sub-clause 2.7.4