Hello again.
The following is food for thought that came to light during a recent project
development meeting. I invite your comments and anecdotes on the following.
My earlier post regarding test probe 11 of IEC 61032 was related to comparing
force test methods to deflect enclosures to reduce e
In message <000301c7c3c3$d21b44f0$d600a...@tamuracorp.com>, dated Wed,
11 Jul 2007, Brian O'Connell writes:
>While we wait for the 'whenever' period to expire, does anyone know of
>a reasonably-priced seminar for HBSE intended for a (somewhat)
>experienced compliance person ? Perhaps a good bo
HBSE intended for a (somewhat) experienced
compliance person ? Perhaps a good book ?
luck,
Brian
> -Original Message-
> From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org]On Behalf Of John
> Woodgate
> Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2007 3:18 AM
> To: emc-p...@ieee.org
&g
In message
,
dated Tue, 10 Jul 2007, "Tarver, Peter"
writes:
>60065, while easier on the volumetric real estate budget, requires some
>good basic reinforcement applied to the mechanical design in the
>relevant areas.
The 60065 test simulates a localized point load, e.g. the corner of
anoth
4 matches
Mail list logo
