Doug Kealey wrote:
>> We want to further reduce reflections in the chambers at 1.575 GHz for
some
sensitive GPS receiver testing. [We put panels of ferrite cones on the <<
Why not use frequency selective sheet absorber? I know it's made for radar,
and you may be able to get a custom build for the
: Re: improving chamber performance
In message <200604032159.k33lxhiu020...@pompeii.garmin.com>, dated Mon,
3 Apr 2006, "Kealey, Doug" writes
>Is there enough of a possibility that we would inadvertently degrade
>our NSA curves or our field uniformity, that we might want to h
In message <200604032159.k33lxhiu020...@pompeii.garmin.com>, dated Mon,
3 Apr 2006, "Kealey, Doug" writes
>Is there enough of a possibility that we would inadvertently degrade
>our NSA curves or our field uniformity, that we might want to have
>somebody model this idea before we jump into it?
I haven't been dealing with chambers recently, so I don't have the freshest
contact info, but there are manufacturers of the chambers and absorbers who
can help you modeling it. TDK and Siemens were doing it long time ago, I guess
many more have joined meanwhile. Just adding absobers over the tiles
Group,
We are a manufacturer and 4 of our chambers are used largely for FCC
pre-scanning. They are 10' x 10' x 23' lined with ferrite tile on walls and
ceiling. There are sections of ferrite cones on top of the ferrite tiles on
portions of the sides and the end wall.
We want to further redu
5 matches
Mail list logo
