Dear All,
Thank you for your postings, it has given me enough ammunition to persuade the
supplier
to change their point of view, they have now agreed to test correctly.
Regards Rob
- ---
Visit our Internet site at
: safety testing in the USA
Dear Friends,
Many times the vendor does not wish to obtain NRTL Listing because of the
investigation costs involved and the yearly follow-up costs.
One way that vendors might agree to submit their products for NRTL Listing
is to have the buyer pay for all the costs
: Gregg Kervill [mailto:gr...@test4safety.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2002 6:53 PM
To: richwo...@tycoint.com; emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: RE: safety testing in the USA
Thanks for identifying the States Rich - I have tried to get that list for
ages.
BUT - There is an IMPORTANT caveat
Shinn [mailto:john.sh...@sanmina-sci.com]
Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 12:27 AM
To: rob.humph...@reuters.com; emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: RE: safety testing in the USA
There has been some good responses to this post. And it is, in general,
true
that a manufacturer is not mandated
...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: RE: safety testing in the USA
Some states (e.g., North Carolina), counties (e.g., Orange, CA) and cities
(e.g., Los Angeles and San Francisco)have a legal requirement that all
electrical products for sale must be Listed. Some local electrical codes
(e.g., Oregon) require
Hi Rob:
I am in discussions with a potential supplier of IT equipment, Its our
usual policy to request testing to a listed standard
such as UL 60950 for safety in North America.
The supplier has replied that this is not mandatory.
Is he correct? what compels safety
: owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
[mailto:owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org]On Behalf Of
rob.humph...@reuters.com
Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2002 7:46 AM
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: safety testing in the USA
Group,
I am in discussions with a potential supplier of IT equipment, Its
...@majordomo.ieee.org]On Behalf Of
rob.humph...@reuters.com
Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2002 9:46 AM
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: safety testing in the USA
Group,
I am in discussions with a potential supplier of IT equipment, Its our usual
policy to request testing to a listed
Hi Rob:
I am in discussions with a potential supplier of IT equipment, Its our
usual policy to request testing to a listed standard
such as UL 60950 for safety in North America.
The supplier has replied that this is not mandatory.
Is he correct? what compels safety
To: rob.humph...@reuters.com; EMC-PSTC (E-mail)
Subject: RE: safety testing in the USA
Rob.
Required is an interesting term, and this is a long debate involving
OSHA, National Electrical Code, fire codes and when and if anybody inspects
the equipment before its installed.
There are places
-Original Message-
From: rob.humph...@reuters.com [mailto:rob.humph...@reuters.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2002 10:46 AM
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: safety testing in the USA
Group,
I am in discussions with a potential supplier of IT equipment, Its our usual
policy
...@reuters.com [mailto:rob.humph...@reuters.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2002 7:46 AM
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: safety testing in the USA
Group,
I am in discussions with a potential supplier of IT equipment, Its our usual
policy to request testing to a listed standard
such as UL 60950
Group,
I am in discussions with a potential supplier of IT equipment, Its our usual
policy to request testing to a listed standard
such as UL 60950 for safety in North America.
The supplier has replied that this is not mandatory.
Is he correct? what compels safety testing for IT equipment in
13 matches
Mail list logo
