Marc van Doornik wrote:
> Right. It seems I have got it, now. Feel a bit Kelly Bundy-ish right
> now, but I've finally realized my mistake. All the while, I've been
> treating the linear motors as if they were stepping motors with a large
> pole period (2.4", by the way). This also explains all
Jon Elson wrote on 28/11/2007 04:05:
> I think the above quoted text should read "Only one offset word
> is required". You definitely can have two. I think with the
> in-plane only arcs that EMC does, you can't have 3. Some
> controls allow arcs in arbitrary planes, and you can have an arc
On Nov 28, 2007, at 7:42 AM, Marc van Doornik wrote:
> Right. It seems I have got it, now. Feel a bit Kelly Bundy-ish right
> now, but I've finally realized my mistake. All the while, I've been
> treating the linear motors as if they were stepping motors with a
> large
> pole period (2.4", by t
Right. It seems I have got it, now. Feel a bit Kelly Bundy-ish right
now, but I've finally realized my mistake. All the while, I've been
treating the linear motors as if they were stepping motors with a large
pole period (2.4", by the way). This also explains all that hysteresis
stuff and the s
Hello,
now it works,
just three suggestions:
1) add "spindle speed" field and add a M3 SXXX at the beginning. If we don't
start the spindle, facing is not possible ;)
2) Change the "Cutting Speed IPM" lable in "Cutting Speed IPM or mm/min" so if
one is using mm knows that the field indicat
John,
please check wiki page for a note on the face.py
thanks
tomp
-
SF.Net email is sponsored by: The Future of Linux Business White Paper
from Novell. From the desktop to the data center, Linux is going
mainstream. Let i
On Mon, 2007-11-26 at 20:47 -0500, Patrick Ferrick wrote:
> Which brings me to another question: by upgrading to frantic ferret or
> whatever the latest Ubuntu distro is called, am I taking a risk that my
> hard-won ini tweaks will no longer work? Can I expect my current ini
> files to work w
