On Thu, 2008-04-24 at 21:24 -0500, Jeff Epler wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 09:17:16PM -0400, Dave Keeton wrote:
> > Just to clarify, Has MODBUS been enabled in classicladder in the
> > latest EMC release?
>
> No. The version of classicladder in emc 2.2.4 and the
> soon-to-be-released 2.2.5 do
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 09:17:16PM -0400, Dave Keeton wrote:
> Just to clarify, Has MODBUS been enabled in classicladder in the
> latest EMC release?
No. The version of classicladder in emc 2.2.4 and the
soon-to-be-released 2.2.5 does not include modbus support.
Jeff
---
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 16:13:11 -0400
> From: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [Emc-users] sherline configurations
> To: "Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)"
>
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; for
Just to clarify, Has MODBUS been enabled in classicladder in the latest EMC
release? If so, how exactly do you enable it? I understand how to enable it in
TCP in but I haven't quite figured out the serial in the stand alone
version.Can some one point me to a reference for how to set up the c
On Thursday 24 April 2008, Gene Heskett wrote:
>On Thursday 24 April 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>> Gene Heskett wrote:
A bit rough on an obvious newbie, John. In this case, and reading
between the
lines, I'm guessing that the terminology and format of the questions
stepcon
On Thursday 24 April 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Gene Heskett wrote:
>>> A bit rough on an obvious newbie, John. In this case, and reading
>>> between the
>>> lines, I'm guessing that the terminology and format of the questions
>>> stepconf
>>> is asking are in effect, swahili to the OP, the
Mny times, the person asking the question is doing so because he is lost as to
what could be the problem. Without someone to tell him what is important, how
does he know what to say?
Often the first cry for help is expected to be a opener so you can tell him
what is important and what is not
Then, dont call this EMC-users
Rather change this to EMC-Developers and have no users.
or,
if someone doesn't have something positive to say to a rudimentary
question then don't participate.
A user's list is for exactly that with questions from beginner to advanced.
If folks want to complain abo
Thank you all for all your wonderful help, I think now I'll be able to get
my mill to run properly.--- Begin Message ---
Thank you all for all your wonderful help, I think now I'll be able to get my
mill to run properly.
--- End Message ---
On 24 Apr 2008 at 10:49, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mike,
In each axis you can "test" your settings and adjust them after each test. To
get you
in the ball park use a ruler and move 1" if you only get 1/2" the you need
twice as
many steps. If you don't know the specifics about your machine you
Mike,
Assuming you are using steppers...
First you need to know how many threads per inch your lead screws are
for each axis. The manufacturer should be able to get you this info, or
perhaps Google. Each axis could be different.
Next you need to know how many steps per revolution for each moto
Oops - only answered half of your question:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Also
> the Y and Z axes run backwords
In general, if it is going backwards, change the sign of the scale
value. If you had 2 steps per inch and it is going the wrong way,
use -2 steps per inch.
Since I haven't use
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> I've tried putting numbers in like 400 steps per rev .5 micro stepping
> and the machine only travels half the distance that you tell it to. Also
> the Y and Z axes run backwords and I can't figure out where to go from
> here. any help would be greatly appreciated.
Now
I agree that the integrator must put some effort into understanding the machine
he/she is installing EMC into. I was the good cop this time and you were the
bad
cop...lol
I have almost never failed to get an answer to a "specific" question either
here or on
the irc or on cnczone about EMC and
On Thursday 24 April 2008, John Kasunich wrote:
>Gene Heskett wrote:
>> A bit rough on an obvious newbie, John. In this case, and reading between
>> the lines, I'm guessing that the terminology and format of the questions
>> stepconf is asking are in effect, swahili to the OP, they are quite
>> co
> Gene Heskett wrote:
>
>> A bit rough on an obvious newbie, John. In this case, and reading
>> between the
>> lines, I'm guessing that the terminology and format of the questions
>> stepconf
>> is asking are in effect, swahili to the OP, they are quite concise
>> because of
>> the gui's limits. W
Gene Heskett wrote:
> A bit rough on an obvious newbie, John. In this case, and reading between
> the
> lines, I'm guessing that the terminology and format of the questions stepconf
> is asking are in effect, swahili to the OP, they are quite concise because of
> the gui's limits. When I ran
On Thursday 24 April 2008, John Kasunich wrote:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> I'm looking for the numbers to put in for all four axes so that it runs
>> properly
>
>In other words, it sounds like you know absolutely nothing about your
>own machine, and you want someone else to do all the work for yo
In defense of John and many of the other long time EMC
supporters, it is easy to get frustrated answering questions
for people who seem to not be willing to try to help themselves.
Newbies in many forums often fail, or seem to fail, to read
any of the already available information.
I do not have a
There are hundreds of users out there with factory Sherline
configurations running on the old BDI install and who may
be interested in upgrading to EMC2. Sherline does not seem
to be interested in helping them upgrade to EMC2 and I am
not sure what special things were modified in the Sherline
setup
Everyone has to start somewhere.
Give the guy a break.
Why be part of a group when you dont want to help out?
John Kasunich wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
>> I'm looking for the numbers to put in for all four axes so that it runs
>> properly
>>
>
> In other words, it sounds like y
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'm looking for the numbers to put in for all four axes so that it runs
> properly
In other words, it sounds like you know absolutely nothing about your
own machine, and you want someone else to do all the work for you.
Stepconf is very simple to use - just answer the
> Which number are you looking for? I assume it has something to do with an
> "A" axis
> but that is as far as I can guess...
>
> A lot more detail on what you want would help someone figure out what to
> tell you.
>
> John
>
> On 24 Apr 2008 at 5:56, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> Can anyone tell m
Which number are you looking for? I assume it has something to do with an "A"
axis
but that is as far as I can guess...
A lot more detail on what you want would help someone figure out what to tell
you.
John
On 24 Apr 2008 at 5:56, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Can anyone tell me the right numb
Can anyone tell me the right numbersto pput inn the step-config wizard in
ubuntuu live emc2 for a sherline mill with wn a-axis?
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference
Don't miss this year's excit
--- Begin Message ---
Original Message
Subject: sherline configurations
From:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date:Wed, April 23, 2008 3:31 pm
To: emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
26 matches
Mail list logo
