On Sat, Sep 13, 2008 at 05:34:40PM -0400, Lonnie Headley wrote:
> Here is the URL for the AIO-500:
> http://www.dsns.com/shop/item.asp?itemid=84
>
> I've tried to fiddle with the time adjustments for EMC2, I'm guessing this
> may need some science applied here :-P
This appears to be a board that
Lonnie Headley wrote:
> A few months ago, I purchased an AIO-500 kit with motors from eBay user
> "dsns". Everything is wired up as shown in the docs. The computer running
> EMC2 is a Celeron 1.1 with 384MB of ram and parallel port is set to SPP in
> BIOS if that matters. I have tested for max jitt
I am new to EMC and have managed to get my lathe to jog in X and Y without
problems. I also have my step/direction spindle working, It runs in both
direction and I can vary the speed but until I can read the speed it is
running at I can't configure it correctly.
I have a "one pulse per rev" signa
Is there a simple "get round" for now?
>>>
>>> So far I have seen only a couple, incomplete, answers from you.
>>> I still don't know if you use probe_parport in your configs, or if you
>>> actually need to do that.
>>> Taking that out from the config would probably make your error go away.
>
On Sat, 13 Sep 2008 13:23:20 +0300, you wrote:
>sorry.. I should finish thinking before I write and send...
>
>>> Is there a simple "get round" for now?
>>
>> So far I have seen only a couple, incomplete, answers from you.
>> I still don't know if you use probe_parport in your configs, or if you
>
On Saturday 13 September 2008, Alex Joni wrote:
> Sure, it's always been open for review/comment, though we should move this
> to the emc-devel list,
Still awaiting answers to other questions on the dev list, so does it really
make a difference where the topic is raised ?
---
sorry.. I should finish thinking before I write and send...
>> Is there a simple "get round" for now?
>
> So far I have seen only a couple, incomplete, answers from you.
> I still don't know if you use probe_parport in your configs, or if you
> actually need to do that.
> Taking that out from the
> Is there a simple "get round" for now?
So far I have seen only a couple, incomplete, answers from you.
I still don't know if you use probe_parport in your configs, or if you
actually need to do that.
Taking that out from the config would probably make your error go away.
> I'm also battling wi
On Sat, 13 Sep 2008 09:35:06 +0300, you wrote:
>I agree, it shouldn't happen.
>
>> Do you wish to discuss the correct way to handle parport registration, or
>> is
>> the code not open to review/comment without inciting cries of "fud" from
>> the
>> CCM dept. ?
>
>Sure, it's always been open for
