2014-07-02 23:18 GMT+03:00 andy pugh :
> The alternative is to MDI the M03 then run-from-line
Definitely NO, because it is not a mill that can start spindle at
first and only then do rapid move to point, where it starts actual
machining. Waterjet is just like plasma - the nozzle/torch has to do
ra
hi
i use google to fine who make mach3 and found a lot noise.
who actually make mach3 and is there web link to them ?
thanks
aram
--
Open source business process management suite built on Java and Eclipse
Turn processes i
On 03/07/14 20:54, a k wrote:
> hi
> i use google to fine who make mach3 and found a lot noise.
> who actually make mach3 and is there web link to them ?
There is only one manufacturer who is Newfangled
http://www.machsupport.com/
There are a growing number of hacked versions floating around :(
Hi Aram!
On 03.07.2014 21:54, a k wrote:
> hi
> i use google to fine who make mach3 and found a lot noise.
> who actually make mach3 and is there web link to them ?
You would also ask Apple about who develops MS Word, wouldn't you?
Anyway, a quick web search yielded this promising link:
http://
Greetings;
I'm in the process of making yet another encoder disk for the lathe as I
fine tune the code to get the correct width(duty cycle) of the slots, and
making the center hole a couple thou bigger as it turns out the high spot
corresponds to the peak of the thread where it is sitting on th
On 07/03/2014 04:18 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
>
> But it occurs to me that this code is dig cutting, meaning the bit as it
> dulls, will skid rather than shave at first contact and be pushed farther
> and farther off the line until it snaps.
I have been climb milling since 1997, when I got ballscrews
On Thursday 03 July 2014 21:28:00 Jon Elson did opine
And Gene did reply:
> On 07/03/2014 04:18 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > But it occurs to me that this code is dig cutting, meaning the bit as
> > it dulls, will skid rather than shave at first contact and be pushed
> > farther and farther off the
On 07/03/2014 09:27 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
> believe I need to figure out a way to certify its accuracy
> as g2 cut circles seem to have anywhere up to 3 thou,
> perhaps a bit more of almost random edge wibbles.
> Difficult when the only dial indicators I have are a 1"
> travel, .001" scale, a
On Friday 04 July 2014 00:28:07 Jon Elson did opine
And Gene did reply:
> On 07/03/2014 09:27 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > believe I need to figure out a way to certify its accuracy
> > as g2 cut circles seem to have anywhere up to 3 thou,
> > perhaps a bit more of almost random edge wibbles.
> > Di
