On Wednesday 10 March 2021 12:58:08 John Dammeyer wrote:
> Hi Sam,
> I found by making the wall thickness bigger along with the hole
> smaller and hub larger I was able to mount the hub on the lathe and
> bore both the bore and the outer part of the hub on the lathe to make
> them symmetrical. Th
On Wednesday 10 March 2021 12:58:08 John Dammeyer wrote:
> Hi Sam,
> I found by making the wall thickness bigger along with the hole
> smaller and hub larger I was able to mount the hub on the lathe and
> bore both the bore and the outer part of the hub on the lathe to make
> them symmetrical. Th
This would be an awesome setup for Linuxcnc.
https://www.datron.com/revolutionize-workpiece-setup/
-- Ralph
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
I rather hate to think of the cost ... beautiful stuff ... German made.
It is easy to make a probe; good software to extract the real value of
the probe, not so easy.
Dave
On 3/12/21 9:14 AM, Ralph Stirling wrote:
This would be an awesome setup for Linuxcnc.
https://www.datron.com/revolution
On 03/12/2021 11:14 AM, Ralph Stirling wrote:
This would be an awesome setup for Linuxcnc.
https://www.datron.com/revolutionize-workpiece-setup/
I got a "USB microscope" and built it into a tool holder and
hooked it up with camview to show
in a window of LinuxCNC. It worked, but I really was
I had in mind emulating the concept with Linuxcnc
and low-budget cameras and probes, not forking over
for the German luxury model. I see on eBay cheap
part locating cameras, like this:
https://www.ebay.com/itm/254714062831
and relatively cheap probes like this:
https://www.ebay.com/itm/33309473
The problem with the cheap webcams is all the frame averaging they
automatically do. I regularly see decent machine vision camera bodies on
ebay for ~$100 that won't have this issue. A decent lens is about the
same used.
These pics were all taken with a cheap USB microscope ($50) that was
ne
