I might add the developers and other contributors were very helpful when I
asked for help on any subject related to LinuxCNC.
On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 2:46 PM, Kirk Wallace wrote:
> On 04/03/2014 12:03 PM, John Alexander Stewart wrote:
> > Steve;
> >
> > I'm still stuck lathe wise though, I may j
On 04/03/2014 12:46 PM, Kirk Wallace wrote:
> On 04/03/2014 12:03 PM, John Alexander Stewart wrote:
>> Steve;
>>
>> I'm still stuck lathe wise though, I may just have to bite the bullet
>>> and get a Siemens or Fanuc control otherwise I may well be in the grave
>>> before it gets released here or M
On Thursday 03 April 2014 15:25:49 Steve Blackmore did opine:
> On Thu, 3 Apr 2014 11:54:26 -0500, you wrote:
> >I am a circle of one! :)
> >If I want something bad enough I either pay to have it done OR do it
> >myself. :)
> >
> :)
>
> Done that to some extent here Stuart, abandoned Mach and Lin
On 04/03/2014 12:03 PM, John Alexander Stewart wrote:
> Steve;
>
> I'm still stuck lathe wise though, I may just have to bite the bullet
>> and get a Siemens or Fanuc control otherwise I may well be in the grave
>> before it gets released here or Mach 4 turn materialises.
>>
>
> I thought the new T
Steve;
I'm still stuck lathe wise though, I may just have to bite the bullet
> and get a Siemens or Fanuc control otherwise I may well be in the grave
> before it gets released here or Mach 4 turn materialises.
>
I thought the new Tormach lathe runs LinuxCNC? Or are the reports out there
wrong?
On Thu, 3 Apr 2014 11:54:26 -0500, you wrote:
>I am a circle of one! :)
>If I want something bad enough I either pay to have it done OR do it
>myself. :)
:)
Done that to some extent here Stuart, abandoned Mach and Linux for Bert
Edings offering - it's based heavily on LinuxCNC code but amazingl
I am a circle of one! :)
If I want something bad enough I either pay to have it done OR do it
myself. :)
Just saying
Stuart
On Apr 3, 2014 11:50 AM, "andy pugh" wrote:
> On 3 April 2014 17:34, Mark Tucker wrote:
>
> > I am trying to give the linuxcnc/machinekit setup a fair crack of the
> > whip
Judging by what is being said and from what i have seen "Yes"
On 03/04/14 17:47, andy pugh wrote:
> On 3 April 2014 17:34, Mark Tucker wrote:
>
>> I am trying to give the linuxcnc/machinekit setup a fair crack of the
>> whip but it really does seem to be held up by the "inner circle" of
>> Linuxc
On 3 April 2014 17:34, Mark Tucker wrote:
> I am trying to give the linuxcnc/machinekit setup a fair crack of the
> whip but it really does seem to be held up by the "inner circle" of
> Linuxcnc developers.
Who do you imagine this "Inner Circle" is? Can you have a circle of one?
--
atp
If you
I am just hoping that we see things move a lot faster than linuxcnc
development.
I moved away from linuxcnc many years ago to "the other one"
But as soon as the beaglebone/machinekit was announced i thought wow
things are moving on.
But unfortunately it seems this is not the case.
I remember co
On 3-4-2014 17:20, andy pugh wrote:
> On 3 April 2014 15:26, Michael Haberler wrote:
>> We are pleased to announce the formation of the Machinekit project [1][2][3].
> I have no idea what this means.
>
Progress (I hope).
--
11 matches
Mail list logo
