Il giorno mer, 08/02/2012 alle 09.38 -0800, Kirk Wallace ha scritto:
> On Wed, 2012-02-08 at 18:09 +0100, Spiderdab wrote:
> ... snip
> > Thanks for answering. The charge-pump works with the charge-pump rt
> > component into hal, i just wanted to gain some suggestion on using a
> > dedicated new th
On Wed, 2012-02-08 at 18:09 +0100, Spiderdab wrote:
... snip
> Thanks for answering. The charge-pump works with the charge-pump rt
> component into hal, i just wanted to gain some suggestion on using a
> dedicated new thread or if it's ok to use base-thread.
>
> Following your memory, i'll try to
Il giorno mer, 08/02/2012 alle 09.01 -0800, Kirk Wallace ha scritto:
> On Wed, 2012-02-08 at 17:08 +0100, Spiderdab wrote:
> > Hi, finally i'm trying to get my new Keling motors and drivers work,
> > together with a C35 BoB from cnc4pc.
> >
> > I wanted to use the charge-pump function (that, if i
On Wed, 2012-02-08 at 17:08 +0100, Spiderdab wrote:
> Hi, finally i'm trying to get my new Keling motors and drivers work,
> together with a C35 BoB from cnc4pc.
>
> I wanted to use the charge-pump function (that, if i understood, act as
> a watchdog), so i need a signal coming from LinuxCNC every
2012/2/8 Spiderdab <77...@tiscali.it>:
>
> In the same link is written also that one can add a new thread, if the
> base thread period is different from what needed (mine was 49k and
> something..). So do you think is better to add a new thread dedicated to
> the SCHP (charge-pump), or to lower the
Hi, finally i'm trying to get my new Keling motors and drivers work,
together with a C35 BoB from cnc4pc.
I wanted to use the charge-pump function (that, if i understood, act as
a watchdog), so i need a signal coming from LinuxCNC every 12,5 kHz, as
written in the manual.
On our wiki i've found th
