More experiments:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OKCRbs_kcSQ
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
Really nice!, I was waiting for something like this for my plasma tube
cutter, did you make a branch of this in git?
regards
rick
El mié., 19 dic. 2018 a las 15:38, nkp () escribió:
> The video shows the principle of visualization of a rotating table.
> To do:
> to rotate the source contour.
>
>
The video shows the principle of visualization of a rotating table.
To do:
to rotate the source contour.
https://youtu.be/Gk50wphVu80
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
I am satisfied with the fact that the coordinate system now moves when
the table is “rotated”.
(This is seen in the video.)
I think it would be logical to turn the axes in sync with the table:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qfj021uKGq4=youtu.be
I suspect that static workpiece and moving
On Sun, 16 Dec 2018 at 10:00, nkp wrote:
>
> I think it would be logical to turn the axes in sync with the table:
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qfj021uKGq4=youtu.be
I suspect that static workpiece and moving tool is baked-in quite
deeply in Gremlin.
--
atp
"A motorcycle is a bicycle with a
I think it would be logical to turn the axes in sync with the table:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qfj021uKGq4=youtu.be
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
On Saturday 15 December 2018 13:13:30 nkp wrote:
> retrofitting big_machine (17t) (EMC2_control)
>
17tons? Thats definitely out of my pay grade. I think I'm the lists
resident old fart at 84. But it seems to me that a steering switch to
redirect the axis's to the backplot, in the .ini might be
Thanks Andy for the push in the right direction!)
I almost got what I wanted.
OpenGLTk.py:
rotation_vectors = [(1.,0.,0.), (0., 1., 0.)]
rotates around Y axis
(but rotates around Z axis( require - around Y)
___
Emc-users mailing list
https://www.mail-archive.com/emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net/msg17937.html
ps
Vismach in some tasks was limited:
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
Thanks!
But now required Axis.
ps
Vismach in some tasks was limited:
https://www.mail-archive.com/emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net/msg17936.html
but VisMach is pretty easy to visualize the placement
___
Emc-users mailing list
On 12/15/18 5:48 AM, nkp216 wrote:
Has anyone ever had experience setting up (source code editing) Axis
(gremlin) for horizontal boring machines?
https://imgur.com/gallery/m8UhfDJ
Now 3d view is not very convenient.
___
Emc-users mailing list
retrofitting big_machine (17t) (EMC2_control)
What are you trying to do?
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
On Saturday 15 December 2018 08:48:35 nkp216 wrote:
> Has anyone ever had experience setting up (source code editing) Axis
> (gremlin) for horizontal boring machines?
>
> https://imgur.com/gallery/m8UhfDJ
imgur has now hiden the images if you've not registered and logged in.
>
> Now 3d view is
if in glnav.py (function set_view_p)
edit :
self.lat = 0
self.lon = 0
p_view - normal
(but rotates around Z axis( require - around Y)
You can change the views here:
https://github.com/LinuxCNC/linuxcnc/blob/master/lib/python/glnav.py#L395
On Sat, 15 Dec 2018 at 14:54, nkp wrote:
> Now it looks like this:
> https://imgur.com/gallery/cW2PQbO
You can change the views here:
https://github.com/LinuxCNC/linuxcnc/blob/master/lib/python/glnav.py#L395
I suspect that by editing the .lat and ,lon in set_view_p() you can
get what you want.
Now it looks like this:
https://imgur.com/gallery/cW2PQbO
Isn't that view identical to the top-down view of a conventional mill?
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
On Sat, 15 Dec 2018 at 14:26, nkp wrote:
>
> If the axes are positioned in this way:
>
> https://imgur.com/gallery/gqfFde0
>
> the perception of the trajectory will be better.(IMHO)
So it's the rotary table you want to visualise, rather than the radial
mounted on the Z (probably a W?)
Isn't
If the axes are positioned in this way:
https://imgur.com/gallery/gqfFde0
the perception of the trajectory will be better.(IMHO)
What would change? Are you wanting to add the radial axis?
___
Emc-users mailing list
On Sat, 15 Dec 2018 at 13:50, nkp216 wrote:
> Has anyone ever had experience setting up (source code editing) Axis
> (gremlin) for horizontal boring machines?
What would change? Are you wanting to add the radial axis?
--
atp
"A motorcycle is a bicycle with a pandemonium attachment and is
Has anyone ever had experience setting up (source code editing) Axis
(gremlin) for horizontal boring machines?
https://imgur.com/gallery/m8UhfDJ
Now 3d view is not very convenient.
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
20 matches
Mail list logo
