On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 2:10 AM, George Ramsower wrote:
> This is interesting. I've seen this sort of thing on other email lists
> and thought it was some sort of spam or some type of malware. Now I
> understand it's just a mistake. I never thought of this possibility!
> Very interesting what
Brilliant!
Mark
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 6:19 PM, Sebastian Kuzminsky
wrote:
> I propose we make "I Kill Kokomo" the official code name of the next
> release.
>
>
> On 7/29/15 4:16 PM, Robert Ellenberg wrote:
> > Sorry folks, it looks like I managed to butt-dial an email during my
> > commute th
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 6:16 PM, Robert Ellenberg wrote:
> Sorry folks, it looks like I managed to butt-dial an email during my
> commute this morning. Crisis averted :)
>
> Rob
>
Uh huh. Suurre. ;-)
Mark
--
One Man, One Machine, One Computer!
-
This is interesting. I've seen this sort of thing on other email lists
and thought it was some sort of spam or some type of malware. Now I
understand it's just a mistake. I never thought of this possibility!
Very interesting what we can do with our butts.
George R.
On 7/29/2015 5:16 PM, Rob
I was concerned about Pompeo Kirkman killing Kokomo Kiki at the kiosk
before he met up with his kids.
On 7/29/2015 4:16 PM, Robert Ellenberg wrote:
> Sorry folks, it looks like I managed to butt-dial an email during my
> commute this morning. Crisis averted :)
>
> Rob
> On Jul 29, 2015 11:25, "Ge
On 07/29/2015 05:16 PM, Robert Ellenberg wrote:
> Sorry folks, it looks like I managed to butt-dial an email during my
> commute this morning. Crisis averted :)
>
>
Oh MY! Auto spell correction has entered a new level. I
hope this at least caused the guys at NSA to sweat for a
couple minutes.
Seconded!
Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE smartphone
Original message
From: Sebastian Kuzminsky
Date:07/29/2015 5:19 PM (GMT-06:00)
To: "Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)"
Subject: Re: [Emc-users] Before i go bonkers: M98, M99
I propose we make &quo
I propose we make "I Kill Kokomo" the official code name of the next
release.
On 7/29/15 4:16 PM, Robert Ellenberg wrote:
> Sorry folks, it looks like I managed to butt-dial an email during my
> commute this morning. Crisis averted :)
>
> Rob
> On Jul 29, 2015 11:25, "Gene Heskett" wrote:
>
>>
Sorry folks, it looks like I managed to butt-dial an email during my
commute this morning. Crisis averted :)
Rob
On Jul 29, 2015 11:25, "Gene Heskett" wrote:
> On Wednesday 29 July 2015 10:25:39 Pete Matos wrote:
>
> > Hehehe. What?
> >
> >
> > Pete
> >
> > On Wednesday, July 29, 2015, Bertho S
On Wednesday 29 July 2015 10:25:39 Pete Matos wrote:
> Hehehe. What?
>
>
> Pete
>
> On Wednesday, July 29, 2015, Bertho Stultiens
wrote:
> > On 07/29/2015 01:07 PM, Robert Ellenberg wrote:
> > > Pompeo Kirkman kiosk I kid in ipm Kiki Kokomo Kiki I ijkukKokomo
> > > Kiki Kik Kiki the I just just
Hehehe. What?
Pete
On Wednesday, July 29, 2015, Bertho Stultiens wrote:
> On 07/29/2015 01:07 PM, Robert Ellenberg wrote:
> > Pompeo Kirkman kiosk I kid in ipm Kiki Kokomo Kiki I ijkukKokomo Kiki Kik
> > Kiki the I just just my Jim kipm I kill Kokomo Kiki kiosk imp the
> > MIkkujkujk hiking j
On 07/29/2015 01:07 PM, Robert Ellenberg wrote:
> Pompeo Kirkman kiosk I kid in ipm Kiki Kokomo Kiki I ijkukKokomo Kiki Kik
> Kiki the I just just my Jim kipm I kill Kokomo Kiki kiosk imp the
> MIkkujkujk hiking j imitation I K my I I'm K kk I am KikiI I I
> ikkjiiujklukk Kiki nonono iok Kiki j
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 7:07 AM, Robert Ellenberg wrote:
> Pompeo Kirkman kiosk I kid in ipm Kiki Kokomo Kiki I ijkukKokomo Kiki Kik
> Kiki the I just just my Jim kipm I kill Kokomo Kiki kiosk imp the
> MIkkujkujk hiking j imitation I K my I I'm K kk I am KikiI I I
> ikkjiiujklukk Kiki nonono
Pompeo Kirkman kiosk I kid in ipm Kiki Kokomo Kiki I ijkukKokomo Kiki Kik
Kiki the I just just my Jim kipm I kill Kokomo Kiki kiosk imp the
MIkkujkujk hiking j imitation I K my I I'm K kk I am KikiI I I
ikkjiiujklukk Kiki nonono iok Kiki just as I joined Kids I my K my Kiki
I'm knickknacks Kiki
This is the solution.. Just needed to change the output to a diff.
syntax model. It does basicly the same thing so. =)
Thanks.
// A
Den 2015-07-26 kl. 14:55, skrev Dave Caroline:
> Linuxcnc supports subroutines with a different syntax
>
> http://linuxcnc.org/docs/html/gcode/o-code.html
>
> Dave
On 07/26/2015 09:18 AM, andy pugh wrote:
> On 26 July 2015 at 17:01, Kirk Wallace wrote:
>> I haven't looked at how it is done but it looks like Tormach's version
>> has M98, M99
>
> Tormach docs might still be referring to Mach3?
>
Oops, for PathPilot it is Issue 824 and is still open, sorry abo
On 26 July 2015 at 17:01, Kirk Wallace wrote:
> I haven't looked at how it is done but it looks like Tormach's version
> has M98, M99
Tormach docs might still be referring to Mach3?
--
atp
If you can't fix it, you don't own it.
http://www.ifixit.com/Manifesto
--
On 07/26/2015 04:29 AM, Andreas Pettersson wrote:
> It don't seem that LinuxCNC supports M98 and M99 for repetitive tasks..
> like cutting slots with a specific distance..
I haven't looked at how it is done but it looks like Tormach's version
has M98, M99
http://www.tormach.com/m98.html
http://ww
Linuxcnc supports subroutines with a different syntax
http://linuxcnc.org/docs/html/gcode/o-code.html
Dave Caroline
On 26/07/2015, John Thornton wrote:
> Just because code is available in other controls doesn't automagicly
> mean it is included in LinuxCNC. That is an unrealistic expectation...
Instead of that
M98 P1000 L9
use
O1000 CALL
to execute the subroutine once.
If you want to execute it more than once, use a loop (REPEAT, WHILE ..
ENDWHILE, or DO ... WHILE)
You should also define the subroutines before the main program.
So your program could be:
O1000 SUB
> G0Z2.34
> G1x-5
>
On 26 July 2015 at 12:29, Andreas Pettersson wrote:
> It don't seem that LinuxCNC supports M98 and M99 for repetitive tasks..
> like cutting slots with a specific distance..
> M98 P1000 L9
I am not 100% certain what that does, but I think you can have the
same effect with
O200 REPEAT [9]
O1000
Just because code is available in other controls doesn't automagicly
mean it is included in LinuxCNC. That is an unrealistic expectation...
On 7/26/2015 6:29 AM, Andreas Pettersson wrote:
> It don't seem that LinuxCNC supports M98 and M99 for repetitive tasks..
> like cutting slots with a specifi
It don't seem that LinuxCNC supports M98 and M99 for repetitive tasks..
like cutting slots with a specific distance..
For example..
G91 G21
F30
G1x-4.12
G0x5
M98 P1000 L9
G0x2
G90
G0Z50
M30
o1000
G0Z2.34
G1x-5
G0x5
M99
%
(this would work in Mach3, for making several grooves on a cnc lathe).
-
23 matches
Mail list logo
