[Emc-users] Coppercam

Anyone know if there is a Linux replacement for Coppercam? "http://www.galaad.net/coppercam-eng.html"; -- ___ Emc-users mailing list Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://li

Re: [Emc-users] Coppercam

Try searching for "schematic editor" on wiki.linuxcnc.org On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 8:00 PM, ad...@mmri.us wrote: > > Anyone know if there is a Linux replacement for Coppercam? > "http://www.galaad.net/coppercam-eng.html"; > > > > --

Re: [Emc-users] Coppercam

Returns: Search for: schematic editor EmcKnowledgeBase | RecentChanges | PageIndex | Preferences

Re: [Emc-users] Coppercam

admin, Perhaps this will be easier for you. Go to the link below, and look for "circuit board", without the quotes. The wiki search function returns that page as one of the three hits. There are a couple of scripts for circuit board milling - neither is a drop in replacement for CopperCam,

Re: [Emc-users] Coppercam

Thanks for the help, I was looking for something that would open Gerber files in a cam window like a gerberviewer does. The options there looks a bit crude compared with coppercam. It seems like I will have to use windows for this as there are no viable Linux alternatives. Jim Register wrote: > a

Re: [Emc-users] Coppercam

Wierd. It was supposed to find http://wiki.linuxcnc.org/cgi-bin/emcinfo.pl?Eagle2HAL , which has a link to http://www.cadsoft.de/ On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 11:51 PM, ad...@mmri.us wrote: > > Thanks for the help, I was looking for something that would open Gerber > files in a cam window like a ger

Re: [Emc-users] Coppercam

I used to be on Eagle's usergroup years ago. It seems to have developed quite nicely. I already have 3 expensive schematic editors, nonewhich will output gcode. Really crazy. The most cost effective way for me would be to rather get a separate application that will just read the gerbers and produce

Re: [Emc-users] Coppercam

Mark, Searching for "schematic editor" doesn't find it, but searching for "schematics editor" returns three pages. Searching for "schematic" does return the page. Apparently, the search engine uses "exact phrase" matching by default, rather than parsing the search string into two search term