On 01/26/2014 11:54 AM, Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
> I'm working on adding software encoder support to the BeagleBone PRU
> code. Counting up/down is easy, but I'm wondering how to deal with the
> index pulses. Both the Mesa VHDL code and the existing software encoder
> component have quite a va
is a walk-in-the-park but nevertheless will be very useful.
Best wishes
John Prentice
-Original Message-
From: Charles Steinkuehler [mailto:char...@steinkuehler.net]
Sent: 26 January 2014 17:54
To: EMC2-Users-List
Subject: [Emc-users] Encoder Index Support Survey
I'm working on
On Sunday 26 January 2014 13:14:29 Charles Steinkuehler did opine:
> I'm working on adding software encoder support to the BeagleBone PRU
> code. Counting up/down is easy, but I'm wondering how to deal with the
> index pulses. Both the Mesa VHDL code and the existing software encoder
> component
On 1/26/2014 12:11 PM, Peter C. Wallace wrote:
>
> I would simplify the index logic to this:
>
> Always latch the current count on index (probably rising) edge
> and provide the latched count to the driver. Have a (clearable) bit
> that indicates the index was latched.
Thanks! That makes sense
On Sun, 26 Jan 2014, Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
> Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2014 11:54:24 -0600
> From: Charles Steinkuehler
> Reply-To: "Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)"
>
> To: EMC2-Users-List
> Subject: [Emc-users] Encoder Index Support Survey
>
> I&#x
I'm working on adding software encoder support to the BeagleBone PRU
code. Counting up/down is easy, but I'm wondering how to deal with the
index pulses. Both the Mesa VHDL code and the existing software encoder
component have quite a variety of options, and I'm wondering if it is
necessary to su
