Alex Joni wrote:
> Possible, maybe.
> Easy, certainly not.
>
> You would probably need to split emc2 (and all the dataflows) in half.
> Probably somewhere in the emctask/emccanon level.
>
> Basicly you have task which calls the interpreter to read the g-code and
> convert to canonical commands.
>
> Jeff Epler wrote:
>> USB-attached motion control interfaces are not a good match for emc2.
>>
>>
> I have not intention to use an usb motion control controlled by a RT
> HAL-driver of EMC.
> The "external driver " (connected with USB) has an internal motion
> controler (with its PID) and its inpu
Jeff Epler wrote:
> USB-attached motion control interfaces are not a good match for emc2.
>
>
I have not intention to use an usb motion control controlled by a RT
HAL-driver of EMC.
The "external driver " (connected with USB) has an internal motion
controler (with its PID) and its input ( PC--->
USB-attached motion control interfaces are not a good match for emc2.
For more information on what kinds of hardware interfaces work well with
emc2, read
http://wiki.linuxcnc.org/cgi-bin/emcinfo.pl?Emc2HardwareDesign
Jeff
--
Hi all,
First of all: I am not familiar with EMC.
I have a driver, this driver is connect to PC with USB interface, and if
I send to the driver the trajectory (2 axis possiotions), this
trajectory is calculated by a simple application developed by me. The
driver performs its work very well (for my
