On page 4 of the HAL Manual V2.6.0-pre4, 2014-06-12 a float is defined as 64
bits (i.e which I refer to as a double in my programming), which I take to be
the case within a HAL context.
However, on page 44 of the same Manual, it is defined as 32 bits (i.e typically
a float).
Which is correct?
Cecil,
You can send any bugs in the docs to me at bjt...@gmail.com
JT
On 7/2/2014 6:50 AM, Churms, Cecil wrote:
On page 4 of the HAL Manual V2.6.0-pre4, 2014-06-12 a float is defined as 64
bits (i.e which I refer to as a double in my programming), which I take to be
the case within a HAL
On 2 July 2014 12:50, Churms, Cecil cecil.chu...@debeersgroup.com wrote:
However, on page 44 of the same Manual, it is defined as 32 bits (i.e
typically a float).
Which is correct?
It changed at one point.
I guess the definitive answer is here:
On Wed, Jul 02, 2014 at 11:50:23AM +, Churms, Cecil wrote:
On page 4 of the HAL Manual V2.6.0-pre4, 2014-06-12 a float is defined as 64
bits (i.e which I refer to as a double in my programming), which I take to be
the case within a HAL context.
However, on page 44 of the same Manual,
inconsistencies I find through to John Thornton.
Cecil
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Epler [mailto:jep...@unpythonic.net]
Sent: 02 July 2014 02:45 PM
To: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)
Subject: Re: [Emc-users] Float precision/size?
On Wed, Jul 02, 2014 at 11:50:23AM +, Churms, Cecil
Cecil;
As a simple user of LinuxCNC, and one-time head of a large open source
project (that even Apple distributed) I thank you for your feedback, as it
will help make LinuxCNC better.
As my experience shows, many people use the software, but incredibly few
send in feedback or updates, so good
On 7/2/14 05:50 , Churms, Cecil wrote:
P.S. I am a newbie working systematically through the documentation, and
notice bugs/errata here and there, where I can usually work out what is
correct from the context. However, they are spelling/grammar/tech bugs
nevertheless. According to the
