The version a feature appears in needs to be on the features page else
the users googling to a page will not know (I know its a big ask well
into a project).
Dave Caroline
--
Come build with us! The BlackBerry(R) Develope
chris
> > I ran 2.2.8 and upgrded just a couple of hours ago to
> 2.3.3. It is
> > now running fine and I am happy. But how was I to
> figure this out from
> > the manual or the release notes?
>
> Glad you have it working. I can't decide if your
> question is
> rhetorical or not. If it's an
> That said, and I haven't looked at adept yet, can I update my 2.2.8 to
> 2.3.2
> on my kubuntu 6.06 install?
I don't see any problems with that.
Regards,
Alex
--
Come build with us! The BlackBerry(R) Developer Conf
On Sunday 25 October 2009, Dave Caroline wrote:
>I suggest manuals contain version information this come up more than once
>the online manual is a case where anyone may be using it and gaining
>confusion, pointing to change notes is a second best
>
>Dave Caroline
>
I agree with that Dave, the manua
I suggest manuals contain version information this come up more than once
the online manual is a case where anyone may be using it and gaining
confusion, pointing to change notes is a second best
Dave Caroline
--
Come bui
The problem was that you were running 2.2.8 and reading the 2.3.x manual. If
you read the
installed manual it will not be newer than the software version installed and
the title page
shows what version it covers. Unfortunately if you read the online manuals they
always are
for the most curren
On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 02:49:03PM +, Chris Epicier wrote:
>
> I ran 2.2.8 and upgrded just a couple of hours ago to 2.3.3. It is
> now running fine and I am happy. But how was I to figure this out from
> the manual or the release notes?
Glad you have it working. I can't decide if your que
John,
> I am running 2.3.3 and that code runs
> fine. Are you running an older version that does not
> support 360 degree arcs?
I ran 2.2.8 and upgrded just a couple of hours ago to 2.3.3. It is now running
fine and I am happy. But how was I to figure this out from the manual or the
release no
I am running 2.3.3 and that code runs fine. Are you running an older version
that does not
support 360 degree arcs?
John
On 25 Oct 2009 at 10:39, Chris Epicier wrote:
> Hi all
>
> I am trying to get this to wok in axis:
> ==
> g90 g20 g17
> g0
the english message is
All axes missing with motion code
I tend to agree the documentation of available options is not clear
Dave Caroline
==
> g90 g20 g17
> g0 x0 y0 z0 f30
> x.5
> g2 i-.5 j0
> g0 z0.1
> x0 y0
> g20 f30
> g0 z1
> g20 f30
Hi all
I am trying to get this to wok in axis:
==
g90 g20 g17
g0 x0 y0 z0 f30
x.5
g2 i-.5 j0
g0 z0.1
x0 y0
g20 f30
g0 z1
g20 f30
g90
g0 z.1
g0 x0 y0 z0
m2
===
(see also here:
http://wiki.linuxcnc.org/cgi-
11 matches
Mail list logo
