ent" X-terminals were all the rage. You'd just be
> making yours a little "thicker" by packaging it in the same enclosure
> with its not-so remote host:-)
>
> Regards,
> Kent
>> Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 09:22:32 -0500
>> From: Stan Blosse
2006 09:22:32 -0500
> From: Stan Blosser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: [Emc-users] VIA based Mini-ITX
> To: emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> Has anyone ever used
quot;Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)"
>
>To: "Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)"
>Subject: Re: [Emc-users] VIA based Mini-ITX
>Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 15:44:30 +
>
>Jeff Epler wrote:
> > On board video is usually a bad match for realtime linux (se
Jeff Epler wrote:
> On board video is usually a bad match for realtime linux (see
> "Problematic Hardware" under
> http://wiki.linuxcnc.org/cgi-bin/emcinfo.pl?Hardware_Requirements), and with a
> single PCI slot you can't add both video and a parallel port. If you
> can find a similar board with t
On board video is usually a bad match for realtime linux (see
"Problematic Hardware" under
http://wiki.linuxcnc.org/cgi-bin/emcinfo.pl?Hardware_Requirements), and with a
single PCI slot you can't add both video and a parallel port. If you
can find a similar board with two slots, I would get that i
Has anyone ever used one of these little guys to run EMC? I'm mainly only
concerned about the floating point math necessary to run EMC. I'm currently
running on a PIII 1GHz with zero problems (at least on the PC side of things).
I'm considering going in a different directions with the control
