On Tuesday 15 July 2014 12:12:38 Marius Liebenberg did opine
And Gene did reply below:
> I have some spare encoders already. As I said, I want to use what is on
> the shelf already. To save a bit if cash seeing that I have to replace
> the spindle motor that burned out after one hour of working (t
I have some spare encoders already. As I said, I want to use what is on
the shelf already. To save a bit if cash seeing that I have to replace
the spindle motor that burned out after one hour of working (testing
light cuts). I had to replace it anyway with a VFD and new motor.
On 2014-07-15 16:
Clever idea fitting the pulley over the nut.
On 2014-07-15 16:27, sam sokolik wrote:
> same idea..
>
> http://electronicsam.com/images/KandT/conversion/spindle/spindleencoder.JPG
> http://electronicsam.com/images/KandT/conversion/spindle/spindletiminggear.JPG
>
> sam
>
> On 7/15/2014 9:19 AM, Kirk
On 2014-07-15 16:19, Dave Cole wrote:
> Common on older large CNC lathes is a timing belt pulley that has a bore
> sufficient to slide over the hollow spindle.. then a 1:1 ratio to
> another large pulley that is mounted to an encoder.
Exactly what I will have to do.
> Dave
>
> On 7/15/2014 9:44 AM
That is very similar to the emco lathes... (they have a 100 line single
channel + index.) Works very well through the printer port.
sam
On 7/15/2014 9:49 AM, Kirk Wallace wrote:
> One more:
> http://members.shaw.ca/SWSTUFF/spindle-encoder.html
> http://members.shaw.ca/SWSTUFF/index.htm
>
> On 0
On Tuesday 15 July 2014 10:49:39 Kirk Wallace did opine
And Gene did reply:
> One more:
> http://members.shaw.ca/SWSTUFF/spindle-encoder.html
> http://members.shaw.ca/SWSTUFF/index.htm
This is the GCode I started out with for my version.
> On 07/15/2014 07:19 AM, Kirk Wallace wrote:
> > On 07/15
One more:
http://members.shaw.ca/SWSTUFF/spindle-encoder.html
http://members.shaw.ca/SWSTUFF/index.htm
On 07/15/2014 07:19 AM, Kirk Wallace wrote:
> On 07/15/2014 06:44 AM, Marius Liebenberg wrote:
>>
>> On 2014-07-15 14:00, andy pugh wrote:
>>> On 15 July 2014 10:44, Marius Liebenberg wrote:
>>>
On Tuesday 15 July 2014 09:44:32 Marius Liebenberg did opine
And Gene did reply:
> On 2014-07-15 14:00, andy pugh wrote:
> > On 15 July 2014 10:44, Marius Liebenberg
wrote:
> >> What would the highest safe RPM be for a 2048 quadrature spindle
> >> encoder on the 7i76.
> >> I have to use some pull
same idea..
http://electronicsam.com/images/KandT/conversion/spindle/spindleencoder.JPG
http://electronicsam.com/images/KandT/conversion/spindle/spindletiminggear.JPG
sam
On 7/15/2014 9:19 AM, Kirk Wallace wrote:
> On 07/15/2014 06:44 AM, Marius Liebenberg wrote:
>> On 2014-07-15 14:00, andy pug
Common on older large CNC lathes is a timing belt pulley that has a bore
sufficient to slide over the hollow spindle.. then a 1:1 ratio to
another large pulley that is mounted to an encoder.
Dave
On 7/15/2014 9:44 AM, Marius Liebenberg wrote:
> On 2014-07-15 14:00, andy pugh wrote:
>> On 15 Jul
On 07/15/2014 06:44 AM, Marius Liebenberg wrote:
>
> On 2014-07-15 14:00, andy pugh wrote:
>> On 15 July 2014 10:44, Marius Liebenberg wrote:
>>> What would the highest safe RPM be for a 2048 quadrature spindle encoder
>>> on the 7i76.
>>> I have to use some pulleys to mount the encoder on my spin
On 2014-07-15 14:00, andy pugh wrote:
> On 15 July 2014 10:44, Marius Liebenberg wrote:
>> What would the highest safe RPM be for a 2048 quadrature spindle encoder
>> on the 7i76.
>> I have to use some pulleys to mount the encoder on my spindle and I
>> would like to use what I have on the shelf
On 15 July 2014 10:44, Marius Liebenberg wrote:
> What would the highest safe RPM be for a 2048 quadrature spindle encoder
> on the 7i76.
> I have to use some pulleys to mount the encoder on my spindle and I
> would like to use what I have on the shelf if possible.
1:1 is the right ratio, if you
13 matches
Mail list logo
