Stephen Hanna wrote:
> Alan,
>
> Could you set a deadline for these comments?
Thursday April 14. That gives us 2 weeks, which is usual for a
consensus call.
Alan DeKok.
___
Emu mailing list
Emu@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu
Q1: Yes.
Q2: FASTv2
On 3/30/11 8:29 AM, "Alan DeKok" wrote:
>
> For people who didn't attend the EMU meeting at IETF, please answer
> the following consensus call:
>
> Question 1: Are you ready to make a decision on the EAP tunneled method?
>
> Please indicate Yes or No.
>
> Question 2:
Alan,
Could you set a deadline for these comments?
Thanks,
Steve
> -Original Message-
> From: emu-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:emu-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> Alan DeKok
> Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2011 8:30 AM
> To: emu@ietf.org
> Subject: [Emu] Consensus call on EAP Tunneled method
Alan,
Q1: Yes
Q2: FASTv2
Kind regards
Stephen McCann
Research in Motion
On 30 March 2011 13:29, Alan DeKok wrote:
> For people who didn't attend the EMU meeting at IETF, please answer
> the following consensus call:
>
> Question 1: Are you ready to make a decision on the EAP tunneled method?
For people who didn't attend the EMU meeting at IETF, please answer
the following consensus call:
Question 1: Are you ready to make a decision on the EAP tunneled method?
Please indicate Yes or No.
Question 2: If the answer to Question 1 is "Yes", please indicate
support for one of the two p
