>>Could this method work? Should we make it more clearly specified? Or
should we change the protocol to arrive explicitly to the understanding
which type (MSK/EMSK) of IMSK[j] to use?
>You clarification is what I understood the intention of the RFC to be as
well, and makes sense to me. I don’t t
> For Microsoft supported protocol suite PEAP/TTLS/TEAP - are you planning to
> find the common method of TLS 1.3 support for all three or you just want to
> release TLS 1.3 support at the same time for all three?
It’s not our intention to try to force the same solution for every method. We
pla
Hi Jorge,
For Microsoft supported protocol suite PEAP/TTLS/TEAP - are you planning to
find the common method of TLS 1.3 support for all three or you just want to
release TLS 1.3 support at the same time for all three?
For TEAP errata 5770:
Technically TEAP RFC suggests the implicit method of takin
