On Dec 16, 2020, at 5:36 PM, Benjamin Kaduk via Datatracker
wrote:
> To start with the easy one: currently the way in which the structure of
> the Commitment Message is described makes reference to many fields of
> TLS Record Layer structures in order to specify what is fundamentally a
> message
Hi TLS WG,
I'm forwarding my ballot comments on the (now-deferred) EAP with TLS 1.3
draft here, since they relate to some rather core TLS protocol concepts,
and I'd like to get some broader feedback with the extra time given by
deferring the ballot.
Please ensure that comments reach the EMU WG
Benjamin Kaduk has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-emu-eap-tls13-13: Discuss
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer to
Barry Leiba has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-emu-eap-tls13-13: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer to
Alvaro Retana has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-emu-eap-tls13-13: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer to
Hi Éric,
Thank you for your review. Answers in-line:
On 12/10/20 4:13 PM, Éric Vyncke via Datatracker wrote:
> Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-emu-eap-tls13-13: No Objection
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email
