Alan DeKok wrote:
> The current draft is missing some points:
> * SNI for the supplicant to indicate which domain it would like to access
> * supplicant examination of the server certificate to see which domain it
accessed
This is actually a bit of a complex question, I think.
If
FYI
> A new version of I-D, draft-ietf-emu-aka-pfs-07.txt
> has been successfully submitted by Jari Arkko and posted to the
> IETF repository.
>
> Name: draft-ietf-emu-aka-pfs
> Revision: 07
> Title:Forward Secrecy for the Extensible Authentication
> Protocol Method f
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the EAP Method Update WG of the IETF.
Title : Forward Secrecy for the Extensible Authentication
Protocol Method for Authentication and Key Agreement (EAP-AKA' FS)
Topic/Title: EAP defaults for devices that need to onboard
Name of Presenter(s): Michael Richardson (with Alan DeKok)
Length of time requested: 5 minutes (new work)
Document If applicable:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-richardson-emu-eap-onboarding/
Alan and I have written a -00 docu
Dear EMU working group,
We have submitted a new version of the draft "draft-ingles-eap-edhoc",
improving the text and addressing the use of anonymous NAIs and
fragmentation.
Best Regards.
On 11/7/22 10:57, internet-dra...@ietf.org wrote:
A new version of I-D, draft-ingles-eap-edhoc-02.txt
