Re: [Emu] More TEAP issues

I'd support a revision as well.  See below: On 30.11.22 02:14, Joseph Salowey wrote: [Joe] speaking as a participant, I'd be happy to assist with a revision.  I think it is needed.  Most of the current errata are tracked here - https://github.com/emu-wg/teap-errata/pulls. I think the target

Re: [Emu] More TEAP issues

On Tue, Nov 29, 2022 at 2:35 PM Alan DeKok wrote: > Based on interoperability testing, it looks like implementations > followed EAP-FAST for derivation of the MS-MPPE keys, and not RFC 7170: > > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/hostap/2022-July/040639.html > >

[Emu] More TEAP issues

Based on interoperability testing, it looks like implementations followed EAP-FAST for derivation of the MS-MPPE keys, and not RFC 7170: http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/hostap/2022-July/040639.html http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/hostap/2022-November/041060.html I think this