On Nov 18, 2022, at 8:50 AM, Heikki Vatiainen wrote:
>
> Please find below some fixes and suggestions for
> draft-ietf-emu-tls-eap-types-09
>
> Apart from the first item (TEAP label), which could also be considered a
> typo, I think these are clarifications, not functional changes.
I agree.
On Jan 4, 2023, at 11:45 AM, Oleg Pekar wrote:
>
> Hi all,
> Few more comments:
> 1) Section "3.3.4. Protected Termination and Acknowledged Result Indication"
>
> Except as noted below, the Crypto-Binding TLV MUST be
>exchanged and verified before the final Result TLV exchange,
>regardl
Hi all,
Few more comments:
1) Section "3.3.4. Protected Termination and Acknowledged Result
Indication"
Except as noted below, the Crypto-Binding TLV MUST be
exchanged and verified before the final Result TLV exchange,
regardless of whether or not there is an inner EAP method
authenticat
On Jan 4, 2023, at 5:09 AM, Eliot Lear wrote:
>
> We have discussed not adding a lot into TEAP, but it might be good to
> consider removing some stuff. PAC tops the list of things I'd like to see
> removed. This is relevant to Erratum 5844 in that the example given contains
> a PAC/PAC-Acknow
On Jan 4, 2023, at 3:20 AM, Eliot Lear wrote:
>
> This document is a complete specification, and as such should obsolete RFC
> 7170 (if approved).
Address in
https://github.com/emu-wg/rfc7170bis/commit/225cd8a0ce908febf12f1e4c16ab2eae3db3ce5f
Alan DeKok.
_
On Jan 4, 2023, at 3:18 AM, Eliot Lear wrote:
>
> This is almost editorial.
>
> The TLV registry and the various registrations should now be pointed to this
> document as the authority rather than RFC 7170, and we should retain the
> registration policy statement for TLVs here. Frankly, specif
On Wed, 4 Jan 2023, at 09:17, Alexander Clouter wrote:
>
> For TEAP (and similarly for FAST) we need to do more than just state
> "PACs are dead use NewSessionTicket"[1].
Looks like I jumped at this too quickly, there is some text from the original
RFC7170:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html
We have discussed not adding a lot into TEAP, but it might be good to
consider removing some stuff. PAC tops the list of things I'd like to
see removed. This is relevant to Erratum 5844 in that the example given
contains a PAC/PAC-Acknowledgment. This also, has bearing on whether or
not we bu
On Tue, 27 Sep 2022, at 13:25, internet-dra...@ietf.org wrote:
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> directories.
> This draft is a work item of the EAP Method Update WG of the IETF.
>
> Title : TLS-based EAP types and TLS 1.3
> Author : Alan
This document is a complete specification, and as such should obsolete
RFC 7170 (if approved).
Eliot
___
Emu mailing list
Emu@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu
This is almost editorial.
The TLV registry and the various registrations should now be pointed to
*this* document as the authority rather than RFC 7170, and we should
retain the registration policy statement for TLVs here. Frankly,
specification required is just a little thin. We probably shou
11 matches
Mail list logo
