Hi Alan,
I second Rich's approval.
Nick
On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 11:26 AM Salz, Rich wrote:
> >At this point, I don't think so. We have implementations which use these
> values.
>
> That's fine, interop over all.
>
> > Does the space cause a problem? I don't recall seeing guidance on TLS
> expo
On Jan 23, 2023, at 9:05 AM, Heikki Vatiainen wrote:
> I also support deleting the PAC related parts. That would make it
> clearer which parts of TEAP remain in active use.
OK. I'll do that this week, and then push out a new revision of the
document. Once that's done, I don't think there's m
On Mon, 23 Jan 2023, at 14:05, Heikki Vatiainen wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Jan 2023 at 16:24, Alan DeKok
> wrote:
>>
>> On Jan 16, 2023, at 8:00 PM, Joseph Salowey wrote:
>> > [Joe] Speaking as a contributor, I would rather see the text deleted if
>> > no-one plans on implementing it. This would make
On Tue, 17 Jan 2023 at 16:24, Alan DeKok
wrote:
>
> On Jan 16, 2023, at 8:00 PM, Joseph Salowey wrote:
> > [Joe] Speaking as a contributor, I would rather see the text deleted if
> > no-one plans on implementing it. This would make the document simpler.
>
> If no one objects in the next week o
