Re: [Emu] Call for EMU agenda items for IETF 116

2023-02-28 Thread Alexander Clouter
On Wed, 1 Mar 2023, at 01:44, Meiling Chen wrote: > I would like to discuss EAP-TLS-IBS this time, Since last adoption process, > we are still waiting for more people to be interested. I thought the hold up was OpenSSL does not support RFC7250 without patching? https://github.com/openssl/openssl

Re: [Emu] Call for EMU agenda items for IETF 116

2023-02-28 Thread Meiling Chen
Hi, I would like to discuss EAP-TLS-IBS this time, Since last adoption process, we are still waiting for more people to be interested. Best, Meiling From: Peter Yee Date: 2023-02-27 18:10 To: 'EMU WG' Subject: [Emu] Call for EMU agenda items for IETF 116 We are now about one month out from IETF

[Emu] [IANA #1267379] expert review for draft-ietf-emu-aka-pfs (eapsimaka-numbers)

2023-02-28 Thread David Dong via RT
Dear Vesa Lehtovirta (cc: emu WG), As the designated expert for the Attribute Types (Skippable Attributes 128-255) registry, can you review the proposed registration in draft-ietf-emu-aka-pfs for us? Please see https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-emu-aka-pfs/ The due date is March 14,

Re: [Emu] [Lake] EDHOC rekey

2023-02-28 Thread John Mattsson
Hi, Let’s have some discussion based on the presentation at the interim. My view is that the thing that would make sense to do in LAKE is to have a new method 4 that can be used for both the initial handshake and for resumption, similar to the PSK authentication in TLS 1.3. +-