Re: [Emu] Suggestion: draft-arkko-eap-aka-kdf-09

2009-01-18 Thread yogendra pal
Jari, Case-3, and Case-4 of test vectors for EAP-AKA' provided by me w.r.t draft-eap-aka-kdf-XX.txt lacks the SQN and long term secret as pointed by Jari. I have option for Jari to either replace the {case-3, case-4} with {case-5, case-6}. (see below for case-5,6) . Since I don't have the SQN a

Re: [Emu] Suggestion: draft-arkko-eap-aka-kdf-09

2009-01-05 Thread Russ Housley
I like test vectors that have two independent implementations. That seems to be the case here, so please proceed. Russ At 02:07 AM 1/5/2009, yogendra pal wrote: Russ, Could you let us know whether we can include the these test vectors or not ? Thanks Yogendra On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 1:57 AM

Re: [Emu] Suggestion: draft-arkko-eap-aka-kdf-09

2009-01-04 Thread yogendra pal
Russ, Could you let us know whether we can include the these test vectors or not ? Thanks Yogendra On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 1:57 AM, Jari Arkko wrote: > Wonderful. Are we ready to include these values in an appendix of the RFC? > Russ, would you mind if we do that? > > Jari > > Jouni Malinen wrot

Re: [Emu] Suggestion: draft-arkko-eap-aka-kdf-09

2008-12-20 Thread Jari Arkko
Wonderful. Are we ready to include these values in an appendix of the RFC? Russ, would you mind if we do that? Jari Jouni Malinen wrote: On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 06:05:41PM +0530, yogendra pal wrote: I hope Jouni can test the case-2, case-3, case-4 with his implementation for further verif

Re: [Emu] Suggestion: draft-arkko-eap-aka-kdf-09

2008-12-20 Thread Jouni Malinen
On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 06:05:41PM +0530, yogendra pal wrote: > I hope Jouni can test the case-2, case-3, case-4 with his > implementation for further verification. I can confirm that I get the same key derivation results (IK', CK', K_encr, K_aut, K_re, MSK, EMSK) for these cases. -- Jouni Mali

Re: [Emu] Suggestion: draft-arkko-eap-aka-kdf-09

2008-12-04 Thread Jari Arkko
This is very interesting and potentially useful. Note that the RFC probably comes out sometime in January, so if you have some way of verifying (e.g., to another implementation) before then, perhaps we could argue for this to be added to an appendix. And its always possible to publish a very si

Re: [Emu] Suggestion: draft-arkko-eap-aka-kdf-09

2008-12-04 Thread Jouni Malinen
On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 08:55:36AM +0200, Jari Arkko wrote: > Yes, that is the question. I do not myself have an implementation yet. I > know people are working on one, but without an implementation I'm not sure > I can provide test vectors. This may be a bit late for the RFC, but how about some

Re: [Emu] Suggestion: draft-arkko-eap-aka-kdf-09

2008-11-10 Thread Jari Arkko
annes From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of ext yogendra pal Sent: 11 November, 2008 08:12 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: emu@ietf.org Subject: [Emu] Suggestion: draft-arkko-eap-aka-k

Re: [Emu] Suggestion: draft-arkko-eap-aka-kdf-09

2008-11-10 Thread Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo)
: [Emu] Suggestion: draft-arkko-eap-aka-kdf-09 Hi Jari, After reading the latest draft version of the eap-aka-df-09, I think there should be a "Appendix: Test Vectors" for testing purpose providing the details for EAP-Request/AKA'-Ch

[Emu] Suggestion: draft-arkko-eap-aka-kdf-09

2008-11-10 Thread yogendra pal
Hi Jari, After reading the latest draft version of the eap-aka-df-09, I think there should be a "Appendix: Test Vectors" for testing purpose providing the details for EAP-Request/AKA'-Challenge and EAP-Reply/AKA-Challenge. Best Regards Yogendra Pal _