Re: [Emu] draft-ietf-emu-eap-tls13-09

2020-06-16 Thread Hannes Tschofenig
Tschofenig ; emu@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Emu] draft-ietf-emu-eap-tls13-09 Hi Hannes, On 6/12/20 11:29 AM, Hannes Tschofenig wrote: A short follow-up on my own review: I wrote: " Pre-Shared Key (PSK) authentication SHALL NOT be used except for resumption. " What you want to say tha

Re: [Emu] draft-ietf-emu-eap-tls13-09

2020-06-15 Thread Mohit Sethi M
Hi Hannes, On 6/12/20 11:29 AM, Hannes Tschofenig wrote: A short follow-up on my own review: I wrote: " Pre-Shared Key (PSK) authentication SHALL NOT be used except for resumption. " What you want to say that that EAP-TLS MUST NOT use external PSKs. I wonder why you want to rule that use

[Emu] draft-ietf-emu-eap-tls13-09

2020-06-12 Thread Hannes Tschofenig
Hi all, I took a quick look at the -09 draft. Here are a few comments. 1. Introduction The text in the introduction is confusing. To be honest, this document is actually not needed because TLS allows you to negotiate version and features.. Obviously, the introduction does not say that and

Re: [Emu] draft-ietf-emu-eap-tls13-09

2020-06-12 Thread Hannes Tschofenig
A short follow-up on my own review: I wrote: > " > Pre-Shared Key (PSK) authentication SHALL NOT be used except >for resumption. > " > What you want to say that that EAP-TLS MUST NOT use external PSKs. I wonder > why you want to rule that use case out? It is a perfectly fine use case for >