Re: [Emu] draft-ietf-emu-eap-tls13-11: Updates RFC 5216

2020-11-02 Thread Alan DeKok
On Nov 2, 2020, at 4:37 AM, Hannes Tschofenig wrote: > IMHO the entire text in Section 5.7 reads a bit like you are giving > implementation guidance. That would be great if John or you had written such > code. I don’t know whether you have. > You are given the reader the impression that there is

Re: [Emu] draft-ietf-emu-eap-tls13-11: Updates RFC 5216

2020-11-02 Thread Mohit Sethi M
ber 2, 2020 9:59 AM To: Hannes Tschofenig <mailto:hannes.tschofe...@arm.com>; Mohit Sethi M <mailto:mohit.m.se...@ericsson.com>; emu@ietf.org<mailto:emu@ietf.org> Subject: Re: [Emu] draft-ietf-emu-eap-tls13-11: Updates RFC 5216 Hi Hannes, As said, we added this text based on the

Re: [Emu] draft-ietf-emu-eap-tls13-11: Updates RFC 5216

2020-11-02 Thread Hannes Tschofenig
enters use the latest version of TLS 1.2 code already anyway, which comes with sensible defaults. Do you have a different experience? Ciao Hannes From: Mohit Sethi M Sent: Monday, November 2, 2020 9:59 AM To: Hannes Tschofenig ; Mohit Sethi M ; emu@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Emu] draft-ietf-emu-ea

Re: [Emu] draft-ietf-emu-eap-tls13-11: Updates RFC 5216

2020-11-02 Thread Mohit Sethi M
er 31, 2020 6:06 PM To: Hannes Tschofenig <mailto:hannes.tschofe...@arm.com>; emu@ietf.org<mailto:emu@ietf.org> Subject: Re: [Emu] draft-ietf-emu-eap-tls13-11: Updates RFC 5216 Hi Hannes, This text and guidance was specifically requested by working group members like Alan. Unless th

Re: [Emu] draft-ietf-emu-eap-tls13-11: Updates RFC 5216

2020-11-01 Thread Hannes Tschofenig
. If you look at this case as a working group chair then you might see the points I am trying to get across. Ciao Hannes From: Mohit Sethi M Sent: Saturday, October 31, 2020 6:06 PM To: Hannes Tschofenig ; emu@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Emu] draft-ietf-emu-eap-tls13-11: Updates RFC 5216 Hi

Re: [Emu] draft-ietf-emu-eap-tls13-11: Updates RFC 5216

2020-10-31 Thread Mohit Sethi M
Hi Hannes, This text and guidance was specifically requested by working group members like Alan. Unless the text is wrong, I don't see any point in removing it. Other TLS-based EAP methods are obviously free to use parts of this text relevant to them. Note that their resumption and authorizatio

Re: [Emu] draft-ietf-emu-eap-tls13-11: Updates RFC 5216

2020-10-21 Thread Alan DeKok
On Oct 21, 2020, at 5:00 AM, Hannes Tschofenig wrote: > the draft says it updates the earlier EAP-TLS version and claims that the > updates are related to > > * Section 5.6 Authorization > * Section 5.7 Resumption > > The content of Section 5.6 actually does not relate to EAP-TLS but is gene

[Emu] draft-ietf-emu-eap-tls13-11: Updates RFC 5216

2020-10-21 Thread Hannes Tschofenig
Hi all, the draft says it updates the earlier EAP-TLS version and claims that the updates are related to * Section 5.6 Authorization * Section 5.7 Resumption The content of Section 5.6 actually does not relate to EAP-TLS but is generic to all EAP methods. I don't think it even belongs in an EA