Hi all,
there are a number of external resources about GNOME which are used by
people for information. I am specifically thinking about the pages on
Wikipedia here, but I'm sure that there is other stuff as well. It
would look more professional if GNOME's public-facing resources are at
least corre
Thanks for bringing this up Kat. I was suggested by Sri that Sumana
was possibly going to be our contact for helping us out managing our
external resources at Wikipedia. Unfortunately I tried to reach her
out about this back in April with no responses so far.
The various wiki pages you mentioned a
On 23 August 2015 at 15:44, Andrea Veri wrote:
> Thanks for bringing this up Kat. I was suggested by Sri that Sumana
> was possibly going to be our contact for helping us out managing our
> external resources at Wikipedia. Unfortunately I tried to reach her
> out about this back in April with no r
On 2015-08-23 10:44, Andrea Veri wrote:
Thanks for bringing this up Kat. I was suggested by Sri that Sumana
was possibly going to be our contact for helping us out managing our
external resources at Wikipedia. Unfortunately I tried to reach her
out about this back in April with no responses so fa
On Thu, 2015-08-20 at 17:18 +0200, Ekaterina Gerasimova wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> there are a number of external resources about GNOME which are used
> by
> people for information. I am specifically thinking about the pages on
> Wikipedia here, but I'm sure that there is other stuff as well. It
> would
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 2:45 AM Bastien Nocera wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-08-20 at 17:18 +0200, Ekaterina Gerasimova wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > there are a number of external resources about GNOME which are used
> > by
> > people for information. I am specifically thinking about the pages on
> > Wikip
On 24 August 2015 at 18:48, Sriram Ramkrishna wrote:
>
> On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 2:45 AM Bastien Nocera wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, 2015-08-20 at 17:18 +0200, Ekaterina Gerasimova wrote:
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > there are a number of external resources about GNOME which are used
>> > by
>> > people for in
On Mon, 2015-08-24 at 19:09 +0100, Ekaterina Gerasimova wrote:
> it's not a problem for updates to be made as long as they are
> factually correct (for example, next GUADEC location, current board
> list and so on).
> The issue only arises if adding new information or removing existing
> parts of
Le mardi 25 août 2015 à 14:26 +0200, Andre Klapper a écrit :
> Basically yes.
>
> For extended information, see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:COI
Huh, that's interesting. I thought that sure, you shouldn't edit an
article about yourself or something extremely close to you, but that we
were in
