Saggi Mizrahi píše v Po 18. 06. 2012 v 16:15 -0400:
First of all I'd like to suggest not using the LSM acronym as it can
also mean live-storage-migration and maybe other things.
Linux Security Modules (base of SELinux and AppArmor) comes to my mind
every time I see the acronym.
David
--
On 06/25/2012 09:14 AM, Deepak C Shetty wrote:
On 06/25/2012 07:47 AM, Shu Ming wrote:
I think VDSM-libstoragemgmt will let the storage array itself to make
the snapshot and handle the coordination of the various atomic
functions. VDSM should be blocked on the following access to the
On 06/25/2012 08:28 PM, Ryan Harper wrote:
* Andrew Cathrowacath...@redhat.com [2012-06-24 21:11]:
- Original Message -
From: Andy Groveragro...@redhat.com
To: Shu Mingshum...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: libstoragemgmt-de...@lists.sourceforge.net, engine-devel@ovirt.org, VDSM
Project
Hi everyone,
there are patches available for basic UI migration steps described in my
previous email:
Move to GWT 2.4 : http://gerrit.ovirt.org/5613
Move to GWTP 0.7 : http://gerrit.ovirt.org/5684
Let me know if you have any questions.
Vojtech
- Original Message -
From: Vojtech
On 06/25/2012 08:38 PM, Tony Asleson wrote:
On 06/25/2012 09:14 AM, Deepak C Shetty wrote:
On 06/25/2012 07:47 AM, Shu Ming wrote:
I think VDSM-libstoragemgmt will let the storage array itself to make
the snapshot and handle the coordination of the various atomic
functions. VDSM should be
* Deepak C Shetty deepa...@linux.vnet.ibm.com [2012-06-25 10:14]:
On 06/25/2012 08:28 PM, Ryan Harper wrote:
* Andrew Cathrowacath...@redhat.com [2012-06-24 21:11]:
- Original Message -
From: Andy Groveragro...@redhat.com
To: Shu Mingshum...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc:
Hi Vojtech,
I have a few questions on this feature.
1) Are the plugins hosted by the same jboss server that hosts the engine? It
would appear the answer is yes and that no separate container is required for
the plugins.
2) Does each plugin map to a unique extension within WebAdmin? Your
Thanks Vojtech.
Since the plugins are embedded into the WebAdmin HTML page, that seems to
simplify things; no external web service is needed. This approach ties into
the issue over the freedom to decide which technology to use when developing a
plugin. While I agree that jQuery is best for
