Sorry to follow up my own question, but can you give some specific cases where
this would be a problem? Thanks!
-Chris
-Original Message-
From: Morrissey, Christopher
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2012 6:41 PM
To: 'Laszlo Hornyak'; engine-devel
Subject: RE: [Engine-devel] eclipse juno vs
Hi Laszlo,
I have several methods that define the @Override annotation and return
something different from the super class. I haven't had any problems compiling
them in GWT. The return value does extend from the return value of the super
class, although this is a requirement in Java as well so
On 11/02/2012 02:54 PM, Laszlo Hornyak wrote:
> Hi Juan,
>
> I think it is time to correct the version, but I was always wondering why we
> do not use the -SNAPSHOT versioning the maven developers designed? I think
> once we start pushing artifacts to public repositories, it will be a pain to
>
Hi Juan,
I think it is time to correct the version, but I was always wondering why we do
not use the -SNAPSHOT versioning the maven developers designed? I think once we
start pushing artifacts to public repositories, it will be a pain to have
released version in our pom files. I think frontend
I think that it is time to bump the version number in the POMs and in
the RPM spec to 3.2.0:
http://gerrit.ovirt.org/8993
In general I think that we should do this immediately after each
release, bumping to the next expected version number.
Thoughts?
--
Dirección Comercial: C/Jose Bardasano Bao
On 11/02/2012 04:01 AM, Sheldon wrote:
On 11/01/2012 09:52 PM, Keith Robertson wrote:
On 11/01/2012 05:23 AM, Sheldon wrote:
On 10/31/2012 09:37 PM, Keith Robertson wrote:
On 10/31/2012 01:40 AM, Sheldon wrote:
I make a domain name "ISO", Domain type is ISO, Storage Type is
NFS, Format is V1
Hi,
Just noticed that eclipse juno is adding @Ovewrride annotations to methods that
are actually overriding something, like in many cases clone and equals methods
in some of the classes. This is fine for the java compiler, but it in some
cases the GWT compiler is not going to accept this annota
On 11/02/2012 10:01 AM, Sheldon wrote:
On 11/01/2012 09:52 PM, Keith Robertson wrote:
On 11/01/2012 05:23 AM, Sheldon wrote:
On 10/31/2012 09:37 PM, Keith Robertson wrote:
On 10/31/2012 01:40 AM, Sheldon wrote:
I make a domain name "ISO", Domain type is ISO, Storage Type is
NFS, Format is V1
Great Michael!
I will update the wiki part I did the other day for different
distros.
- Original Message -
> From: "Michael Pasternak"
> To: "engine-devel"
> Cc: us...@ovirt.org
> Sent: Friday, November 2, 2012 8:44:40 AM
> Subject: [Engine-devel] ovirt-sdk at pypi
>
> From now on late
On 11/01/2012 09:52 PM, Keith Robertson wrote:
On 11/01/2012 05:23 AM, Sheldon wrote:
On 10/31/2012 09:37 PM, Keith Robertson wrote:
On 10/31/2012 01:40 AM, Sheldon wrote:
I make a domain name "ISO", Domain type is ISO, Storage Type is
NFS, Format is V1
$ sudo engine-iso-uploader -v --iso-do
>From now on latest ovirt-cli will be available at pypi,
for more details see [1].
[1] http://wiki.ovirt.org/wiki/CLI#pypi
--
Michael Pasternak
RedHat, ENG-Virtualization R&D
___
Engine-devel mailing list
Engine-devel@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/
>From now on latest ovirt-sdk will be available at pypi,
for more details see [1].
[1] http://wiki.ovirt.org/wiki/SDK#pypi
--
Michael Pasternak
RedHat, ENG-Virtualization R&D
___
Engine-devel mailing list
Engine-devel@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/
12 matches
Mail list logo
