Adding VDSM and devel list.
Messaggio originale
Oggetto: Re: oVirt 3.3.3 tracker
Data: Wed, 08 Jan 2014 22:03:07 +0200
Mittente: Itamar Heim
A: Sandro Bonazzola , arch ,Doron
Fediuck , Dave Neary ,
"us...@ovirt.org"
On 01/08/2014 07:04 PM, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
> H
On 01/08/2014 06:18 PM, Malini Rao wrote:
> [top posting]
>
> Based on your responses then, we need to tweak Eldan's sketch - see
> attached.
>
> Here, you will see I have two tabs on the right - Unassigned networks and
> Labels. Unassigned networks will list individual networks that have no
Now that BZ#1038525 (live snapshot merge for backup api) is closed as a
duplicate of BZ#647386 ( You are not authorized to access bug #647386 )
Shouldn't BZ#647386 targeted for 3.4? Or for a future version?
___
Engine-devel mailing list
Engine-devel@
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 10:29 AM, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
> Il 08/01/2014 10:23, Sander Grendelman ha scritto:
>> Now that BZ#1038525 (live snapshot merge for backup api) is closed as a
>> duplicate of BZ#647386 ( You are not authorized to access bug #647386 )
>>
>> Shouldn't BZ#647386 targeted
oVirt team has updated the release schedule for 3.4.0 [1]
These are tentative planning dates and may change
General availability: 2014-02-24
oVirt 3.4 Second Test Day: 2014-02-19
RC Build: 2014-02-17
oVirt 3.4 Test Day: 2014-01-27
Beta release: 2014-
Il 08/01/2014 10:23, Sander Grendelman ha scritto:
> Now that BZ#1038525 (live snapshot merge for backup api) is closed as a
> duplicate of BZ#647386 ( You are not authorized to access bug #647386 )
>
> Shouldn't BZ#647386 targeted for 3.4? Or for a future version?
>
BZ#1038525 is open and t
Hi,
as you may know, we're planning to build oVirt 3.4.0 beta really soon and
release 3.4.0 by end of January.
A tracker bug (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1024889) has been
created for this release.
The following is a list of the current blocker bugs with target 3.4.0:
Whiteboard
On 01/07/2014 11:46 PM, Malini Rao wrote:
> Livnat,
>
> I had asked a couple of questions about network labeling reqs offline but
> wanted to continue the discussion on the list. Thank you for the answers and
> I have copied my questions and your answers for context -
>
> 1. Can a network be p
