Re: [Engine-devel] CPU Pinning @engine

2012-05-21 Thread Dor Laor
On 20/05/12 21:41, Dor Laor wrote: On 05/17/2012 11:15 PM, Doron Fediuck wrote: On 17/05/12 20:28, Ayal Baron wrote: Live migration will not be supported for such VM's. Migration will work on homogeneous clusters so this should not be enforced (not limited to VMs which are pinned to host) just give

Re: [Engine-devel] CPU Pinning @engine

2012-05-20 Thread Dor Laor
On 05/17/2012 11:15 PM, Doron Fediuck wrote: On 17/05/12 20:28, Ayal Baron wrote: Live migration will not be supported for such VM's. Migration will work on homogeneous clusters so this should not be enforced (not limited to VMs which are pinned to host) just give a warning. I agree, but if

Re: [Engine-devel] oVirt and Quantum

2012-04-30 Thread Dor Laor
On 04/29/2012 01:41 PM, Gary Kotton wrote: Hi, As part of a POC we have integrated Quantum (http://wiki.openstack.org/Quantum) into oVirt (http://www.ovirt.org/). This has been tested with the OVS and Linux Bridge plugins. The details of the integration can be found at -

Re: [Engine-devel] CPU topology in the API

2012-04-30 Thread Dor Laor
On 04/30/2012 02:37 PM, Simon Grinberg wrote: Hi list, The current status is that though they look the same, CPU topology for hosts and VMs differ. In both you have topology cores=N sockets=Y/ for hosts: Cores = Total cores on the host, Y=number of sockets for VMs: Cores = Cores per

Re: [Engine-devel] CPU topology in the API

2012-04-30 Thread Dor Laor
On 04/30/2012 05:19 PM, Geert Jansen wrote: On 04/30/2012 02:43 PM, Dor Laor wrote: I would go for 4 or 2 Current CPU topology for the hosts is a new commit, thus it may be allowed to change it now since no one is using it yet. This works in favour of 2. In any case only 3 discloses all

Re: [Engine-devel] [vdsm] reserve virtio-balloon device created by libvirt

2012-04-30 Thread Dor Laor
On 04/30/2012 07:30 PM, Itamar Heim wrote: On 04/29/2012 04:19 PM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote: On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 07:24:52AM -0400, Andrew Cathrow wrote: - Original Message - From: Dan Kenigsbergdan...@redhat.com To: Gal Hammergham...@redhat.com Cc: vdsm-de...@lists.fedorahosted.org

Re: [Engine-devel] qemu machine type / datacenter machine version

2012-04-05 Thread Dor Laor
On 04/05/2012 08:14 PM, Itamar Heim wrote: On 04/05/2012 06:27 PM, Ryan Harper wrote: I was playing around with ovirt-engine datacenter definitions and I seems that the capatibility version in the gui controls the qemu machine type specified (3.0 - pc-0.14). I was wondering where that's

Re: [Engine-devel] bridgless networks

2012-02-15 Thread Dor Laor
On 02/15/2012 11:16 AM, Roy Golan wrote: - Original Message - From: Dor Laordl...@redhat.com To: Roy Golanrgo...@redhat.com Cc: engine-devel@ovirt.org Sent: Tuesday, February 7, 2012 12:01:58 PM Subject: Re: [Engine-devel] bridgless networks On 02/06/2012 04:47 PM, Roy Golan wrote:

Re: [Engine-devel] oVirt upstream meeting : VM Version

2012-02-02 Thread Dor Laor
On 02/02/2012 08:46 AM, Itamar Heim wrote: On 02/02/2012 02:56 AM, Eli Mesika wrote: Hi We had discussed today the Stable Device Addresses feature One of the questions arose from the meeting (and actually defined as an open issue in the feature wiki) is: What happens to a 3.1 VM running on 3.1

Re: [Engine-devel] VM Payload feature

2012-01-25 Thread Dor Laor
On 01/22/2012 08:42 PM, Ayal Baron wrote: - Original Message - - Original Message - From: Ayal Baronaba...@redhat.com To: Oved Ourfalliov...@redhat.com Cc: engine-devel@ovirt.org Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2012 4:05:08 PM Subject: Re: [Engine-devel] VM Payload feature