On 01/30/2014 10:47 AM, Michal Skrivanek wrote:
Dear engine-core maintainers,
I'd like to propose Arik Hadas as a maintainer of oVirt engine backend
Since he started with oVirt project in October 2012 he was working in various areas
in engine core, demonstrated his abilities with more than 200
I think it will help stabilizing the new features in a short circle,
sometimes there are small fine tuning fixes that don't have bugs
opened for them and the flow is easier if you can just backport them
without opening a bug.
On 01/30/2014 04:42 PM, Itamar Heim wrote:
I'm inclined to drop the
On 01/21/2014 05:39 PM, Einav Cohen wrote:
Hello UI Maintainers,
I would like to propose Alexander Wels as an ovirt-engine UI maintainer.
+1
Alexander started his ovirt involvement more than a year ago,
contributing over 100 patches (to 'master' alone), including the
branding mechanism,
Hi Vojtech,
I think it'll be helpful for us if you'll send us a draft or some bullet
points of your general idea on how you think to do this change so we'll
come more prepared with opinions and ideas, that is of course unless the
purpose of this meeting is to design it from scratch
On
On 10/07/2013 05:04 PM, Einav Cohen wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Yair Zaslavsky yzasl...@redhat.com
Sent: Monday, October 7, 2013 10:02:39 AM
- Original Message -
From: Tal Nisan tni...@redhat.com
To: Yair Zaslavsky yzasl...@redhat.com
Cc: engine-devel engine-devel
+1
On 10/02/2013 01:57 PM, Tomas Jelinek wrote:
+1
- Original Message -
From: Gilad Chaplik gchap...@redhat.com
To: Livnat Peer lp...@redhat.com
Cc: engine-devel engine-devel@ovirt.org, board bo...@ovirt.org
Sent: Wednesday, October 2, 2013 12:31:41 PM
Subject: Re: [Engine-devel] Lior
...@redhat.com
To: engine-devel engine-devel@ovirt.org, Barak Azulay bazu...@redhat.com
Cc: Yair Zaslavsky yzasl...@redhat.com, Michael Pasternak mpast...@redhat.com,
Tal Nisan
tni...@redhat.com, Ayal Baron aba...@redhat.com
Sent: Sunday, June 30, 2013 11:11:30 AM
Subject: Guid improvements
Hi all
Seems that the cleanup worked, now the actual results after the frontend
cleanup pathces are shown without the false positives
http://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt_engine_find_bugs/4069/
On 04/24/2013 10:11 AM, Michal Skrivanek wrote:
On Apr 24, 2013, at 07:49 , Sahina Bosesab...@redhat.com
I've seen it too, it's after a series of patches I pushed to solve some
findbugs issue that we got this false positive, I've asked Eyal to clean
the target, it seems that findbugs is referring to old code that doesn't
exist anymore.
On 04/24/2013 10:11 AM, Michal Skrivanek wrote:
On Apr 24,
Yeah, had it too and couldn't figure out why cause there were no errors
in Jboss console, only when I ran web mode I saw the DB error in the GWT
console
On 03/08/2013 07:00 PM, Einav Cohen wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Alexander Welsaw...@redhat.com
Sent: Friday, March 8, 2013
Alon has a point here, both classes wrap UUID anyway, it's time to get
rid of this legacy and move to using the standard implementation directly
On 02/03/2013 03:19 PM, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
And for the new people out here... why not kill both and use plain standard
java UUID[1]?
Makes the frontend code much more readable, great job!
Tal.
On 01/26/2013 10:58 PM, Eli Mesika wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Tomas Jelinektjeli...@redhat.com
To: engine-devel@ovirt.org
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2013 11:55:43 AM
Subject: [Engine-devel] [engine-devel] frontend
+2 for #2, seems like most of the work done is adding the annotations,
most of which are not relevant anyway so if we want to get back someday
to the Hibernate effort we will have to check each one individually
anyway, better do it from scratch.
On 01/14/2013 03:36 PM, Allon Mureinik wrote:
13 matches
Mail list logo
