- Original Message -
>
> >> This seems interesting.
> >>
> >> I am interested in pursuing this further and helping contribute to
> >> the
> >> vdsm lsm integration. lsm is still in the early stages, but i feel
> >> its
> >> the right time to start influencing it so that vdsm integration
This seems interesting.
I am interested in pursuing this further and helping contribute to
the
vdsm lsm integration. lsm is still in the early stages, but i feel
its
the right time to start influencing it so that vdsm integration can
be
smooth. My interest mainly lies in how external storage ar
- Original Message -
> On 04/24/2012 07:37 PM, Ayal Baron wrote:
> >
> > - Original Message -
> >> On 04/24/2012 02:07 AM, Ayal Baron wrote:
> >>> - Original Message -
> On 04/22/2012 12:28 PM, Ayal Baron wrote:
> >>> This way we'd have a 2 stage process:
> >>
On 04/25/2012 04:52 PM, Deepak C Shetty wrote:
This seems interesting.
I am interested in pursuing this further and helping contribute to the
vdsm lsm integration. lsm is still in the early stages, but i feel its
the right time to start influencing it so that vdsm integration can be
smooth.
On 04/24/2012 07:37 PM, Ayal Baron wrote:
- Original Message -
On 04/24/2012 02:07 AM, Ayal Baron wrote:
- Original Message -
On 04/22/2012 12:28 PM, Ayal Baron wrote:
This way we'd have a 2 stage process:
1. setupStorage (generic)
I was looking up on the VDSM archives and t
- Original Message -
> On 04/24/2012 02:07 AM, Ayal Baron wrote:
> >
> > - Original Message -
> >> On 04/22/2012 12:28 PM, Ayal Baron wrote:
> > This way we'd have a 2 stage process:
> > 1. setupStorage (generic)
> I was looking up on the VDSM archives and there are t
On 04/24/2012 02:07 AM, Ayal Baron wrote:
- Original Message -
On 04/22/2012 12:28 PM, Ayal Baron wrote:
This way we'd have a 2 stage process:
1. setupStorage (generic)
I was looking up on the VDSM archives and there are talks of using
libstoragemgmt (lsm)
Funny, we started using tha
- Original Message -
> On 04/22/2012 12:28 PM, Ayal Baron wrote:
> >
> >>> This way we'd have a 2 stage process:
> >>> 1. setupStorage (generic)
> >> I was looking up on the VDSM archives and there are talks of using
> >> libstoragemgmt (lsm)
> > Funny, we started using that acronym for L
On 04/22/2012 01:58 AM, Ayal Baron wrote:
> On 04/20/2012 02:23 PM, Deepak C Shetty wrote:
>> under VDSM. I was wondering if the setupStorage would be something
>> where lsm would be used to do the work, it seems fit for purpose
>> here.
>>
>>
>
> I don't think this is the libstoragemgmt mandate
On 04/22/2012 12:28 PM, Ayal Baron wrote:
This way we'd have a 2 stage process:
1. setupStorage (generic)
I was looking up on the VDSM archives and there are talks of using
libstoragemgmt (lsm)
Funny, we started using that acronym for Live Storage Migration :)
under VDSM. I was wondering if
- Original Message -
>
> >>> So although I believe that when we create a gluster volume or an
> >>> ovirt storage domain then indeed we shouldn't need a lot of low
> >>> level commands, but it would appear to me that not allowing for
> >>> more control when needed is not going to work an
On 04/20/2012 02:23 PM, Deepak C Shetty wrote:
So although I believe that when we create a gluster volume or an
ovirt storage domain then indeed we shouldn't need a lot of low
level commands, but it would appear to me that not allowing for
more control when needed is not going to work and that
So although I believe that when we create a gluster volume or an
ovirt storage domain then indeed we shouldn't need a lot of low
level commands, but it would appear to me that not allowing for
more control when needed is not going to work and that there are
enough use cases which do not involve
13 matches
Mail list logo
