Hi all,
Following the upstream meeting dated Wednesday January 18th, 2012 -
I presented the clone VM from snpashot feature and we discussed the
feature behaviour.
Two issues that were raised are the behaviour of the feature in context
of shared disks and direct LUNs-based disks -
On one hand, if w
On 19/01/12 08:38, Yair Zaslavsky wrote:
> Hi all,
> Following the upstream meeting dated Wednesday January 18th, 2012 -
> I presented the clone VM from snpashot feature and we discussed the
> feature behaviour.
>
> Two issues that were raised are the behaviour of the feature in context
> of share
- Original Message -
> From: "Livnat Peer"
> To: "Yair Zaslavsky" , "Mike Kolesnik"
>
> Cc: engine-devel@ovirt.org
> Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2012 9:19:52 AM
> Subject: Re: [Engine-devel] Question about CloneVMFromSnapshot feature
Subject: Re: [Engine-devel] Question about CloneVMFromSnapshot
> > feature in context of shared disks and direct
> > LUNs-based disks
> >
> > On 19/01/12 08:38, Yair Zaslavsky wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > > Following the upstream meeting dated Wednesday Jan
c: engine-devel@ovirt.org
> > > Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2012 9:19:52 AM
> > > Subject: Re: [Engine-devel] Question about CloneVMFromSnapshot
> > > feature in context of shared disks and direct
> > > LUNs-based disks
> > >
> > > On 19/01/12 08:38, Ya
On 01/19/2012 09:19 AM, Livnat Peer wrote:
On 19/01/12 08:38, Yair Zaslavsky wrote:
Hi all,
Following the upstream meeting dated Wednesday January 18th, 2012 -
I presented the clone VM from snpashot feature and we discussed the
feature behaviour.
Two issues that were raised are the behaviour of
- Original Message -
> On 01/19/2012 09:19 AM, Livnat Peer wrote:
> > On 19/01/12 08:38, Yair Zaslavsky wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >> Following the upstream meeting dated Wednesday January 18th, 2012
> >> -
> >> I presented the clone VM from snpashot feature and we discussed
> >> the
> >> feat
On 19/01/12 12:03, Ayal Baron wrote:
>
>
> - Original Message -
>> On 01/19/2012 09:19 AM, Livnat Peer wrote:
>>> On 19/01/12 08:38, Yair Zaslavsky wrote:
Hi all,
Following the upstream meeting dated Wednesday January 18th, 2012
-
I presented the clone VM from snpashot
gine-devel@ovirt.org
>>> Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2012 9:19:52 AM
>>> Subject: Re: [Engine-devel] Question about CloneVMFromSnapshot
>>> feature in context of shared disks and direct
>>> LUNs-based disks
>>>
>>> On 19/01/12 08:38, Yair Zasl
slavsky" , "Mike Kolesnik"
> >>>
> >>> Cc: engine-devel@ovirt.org
> >>> Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2012 9:19:52 AM
> >>> Subject: Re: [Engine-devel] Question about CloneVMFromSnapshot
> >>> feature in context of shared
t;Yair Zaslavsky"
> Cc: engine-devel@ovirt.org
> Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2012 4:04:02 AM
> Subject: Re: [Engine-devel] Question about CloneVMFromSnapshot feature in
> context of shared disks and direct
> LUNs-based disks
>
>
>
> - O
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Ayal Baron"
> > To: "Yair Zaslavsky"
> > Cc: engine-devel@ovirt.org
> > Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2012 4:04:02 AM
> > Subject: Re: [Engine-devel] Question about CloneVMFromSnapshot
> > feature in
;Yair Zaslavsky"
>>> Cc: engine-devel@ovirt.org
>>> Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2012 4:04:02 AM
>>> Subject: Re: [Engine-devel] Question about CloneVMFromSnapshot
>>> feature in context of shared disks and direct
>>> LUNs-based disks
>>
01/19/2012 10:32 AM, Mike Kolesnik wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> - Original Message -
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> - Original Message -
>>>>>> From: "Livnat Peer"
>>>>>>
On 01/20/2012 12:01 PM, Livnat Peer wrote:
On 20/01/12 09:35, Ayal Baron wrote:
- Original Message -
Top Posting:
From user POV I think that option 2 is the only one that make sense.
We try to do as much as we can,
and on each "problematic" case, we make him aware and let him decide
ki
- Original Message -
> From: "Itamar Heim"
> To: "Livnat Peer"
> Cc: engine-devel@ovirt.org
> Sent: Friday, January 20, 2012 7:21:34 AM
> Subject: Re: [Engine-devel] Question about CloneVMFromSnapshot feature in
> context of shared dis
;copy" the VM as is. We
> have to do our best, and highlights the issues/sensitive points he
> has to take care of.
>
>
> does that make sense?
>
> Miki
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Itamar Heim"
> > T
- Original Message -
> From: "Ayal Baron"
> To: "Miki Kenneth"
> Cc: engine-devel@ovirt.org, "Itamar Heim"
> Sent: Friday, January 20, 2012 1:37:54 PM
> Subject: Re: [Engine-devel] Question about CloneVMFromSnapshot feature in
>
On 20/01/12 17:21, Itamar Heim wrote:
> On 01/20/2012 12:01 PM, Livnat Peer wrote:
>> On 20/01/12 09:35, Ayal Baron wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> - Original Message -
Top Posting:
From user POV I think that option 2 is the only one that make sense.
We try to do as much as we can,
On 01/22/2012 09:26 AM, Livnat Peer wrote:
> On 20/01/12 17:21, Itamar Heim wrote:
>> On 01/20/2012 12:01 PM, Livnat Peer wrote:
>>> On 20/01/12 09:35, Ayal Baron wrote:
- Original Message -
> Top Posting:
>
> From user POV I think that option 2 is the only one t
- Original Message -
> On 20/01/12 17:21, Itamar Heim wrote:
> > On 01/20/2012 12:01 PM, Livnat Peer wrote:
> >> On 20/01/12 09:35, Ayal Baron wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> - Original Message -
> Top Posting:
>
> From user POV I think that option 2 is the only one that
- Original Message -
> On 01/22/2012 09:26 AM, Livnat Peer wrote:
> > On 20/01/12 17:21, Itamar Heim wrote:
> >> On 01/20/2012 12:01 PM, Livnat Peer wrote:
> >>> On 20/01/12 09:35, Ayal Baron wrote:
>
>
> - Original Message -
> > Top Posting:
> >
> > Fr
On 22/01/12 12:14, Ayal Baron wrote:
>
>
> - Original Message -
>> On 20/01/12 17:21, Itamar Heim wrote:
>>> On 01/20/2012 12:01 PM, Livnat Peer wrote:
On 20/01/12 09:35, Ayal Baron wrote:
>
>
> - Original Message -
>> Top Posting:
>>
>> From user POV
- Original Message -
> On 22/01/12 12:14, Ayal Baron wrote:
> >
> >
> > - Original Message -
> >> On 20/01/12 17:21, Itamar Heim wrote:
> >>> On 01/20/2012 12:01 PM, Livnat Peer wrote:
> On 20/01/12 09:35, Ayal Baron wrote:
> >
> >
> > - Original Message ---
On 01/22/2012 09:26 AM, Livnat Peer wrote:
On 20/01/12 17:21, Itamar Heim wrote:
On 01/20/2012 12:01 PM, Livnat Peer wrote:
On 20/01/12 09:35, Ayal Baron wrote:
- Original Message -
Top Posting:
From user POV I think that option 2 is the only one that make sense.
We try to do as
On 22/01/12 17:09, Itamar Heim wrote:
> On 01/22/2012 09:26 AM, Livnat Peer wrote:
>> On 20/01/12 17:21, Itamar Heim wrote:
>>> On 01/20/2012 12:01 PM, Livnat Peer wrote:
On 20/01/12 09:35, Ayal Baron wrote:
>
>
> - Original Message -
>> Top Posting:
>>
>> Fro
On 22/01/12 15:21, Ayal Baron wrote:
>
>
> - Original Message -
>> On 22/01/12 12:14, Ayal Baron wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> - Original Message -
On 20/01/12 17:21, Itamar Heim wrote:
> On 01/20/2012 12:01 PM, Livnat Peer wrote:
>> On 20/01/12 09:35, Ayal Baron wrote:
>>>
27 matches
Mail list logo
