- Original Message -
On 22/01/12 09:39, Eduardo Warszawski wrote:
- Original Message -
On 22/01/12 08:28, Eduardo Warszawski wrote:
- Original Message -
- Original Message -
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 06:17:53AM -0500, Ayal Baron wrote:
Can
On 22/01/12 08:28, Eduardo Warszawski wrote:
- Original Message -
- Original Message -
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 06:17:53AM -0500, Ayal Baron wrote:
Can we broaden the scope and also allow passing createVG
partitioned devices with an override flag or something? (we'd
need
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 07:46:17PM +0200, Livnat Peer wrote:
On 17/01/12 16:08, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
On Sun, Jan 08, 2012 at 03:08:13PM +0200, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
Hi Lists,
One cannot create a PV on a partitioned device, and therefor such
devices where not reported to Engine. This
On 18/01/12 12:44, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 07:46:17PM +0200, Livnat Peer wrote:
On 17/01/12 16:08, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
On Sun, Jan 08, 2012 at 03:08:13PM +0200, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
Hi Lists,
One cannot create a PV on a partitioned device, and therefor such
devices
On Sun, Jan 08, 2012 at 03:08:13PM +0200, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
Hi Lists,
One cannot create a PV on a partitioned device, and therefor such
devices where not reported to Engine. This proved surprising to users
who woder where their LUN disappeared.
Vdsm should report all devices, and
On 17/01/12 16:08, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
On Sun, Jan 08, 2012 at 03:08:13PM +0200, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
Hi Lists,
One cannot create a PV on a partitioned device, and therefor such
devices where not reported to Engine. This proved surprising to users
who woder where their LUN disappeared.